Methane, nitrous oxide emissions and mitigation strategies for livestock in developing countries: A review

被引:4
|
作者
Forabosco, F. [1 ,2 ]
Chitchyan, Zh. [1 ]
Mantovani, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Armenian Natl Agrarian Univ, Dept Private Husb, 74 Teryan, Yerevan 0009, Armenia
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Agron Food Nat Resources Anim Environm, Viale Univ 16, I-35020 Padua, Italy
关键词
Breeding; emission intensity; fermentation; greenhouse gas; manure; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION; GENOMIC SELECTION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENTERIC METHANE; PRODUCTIVITY GAINS; MANURE MANAGEMENT; MILK-PRODUCTION; CATTLE SLURRY; GHG EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.4314/sajas.v47i3.3
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) are two important greenhouse gases (GHGs) that are emitted into the atmosphere by livestock during the process of enteric fermentation and manure management. Developing countries produce a large quantity of those emissions, caused mainly by inefficient animal rearing systems, feed production and manure management. This paper outlines the CH4 and N2O emitted from livestock in developing countries and the mitigation actions that could be put in place to reduce atmospheric emissions and increase animal productivity. Emission intensity expresses emission (CO2 equivalents) per unit of product and describes it in relation to the capacity of local animals to produce from local resources. Developing countries are characterized by low production per animal and, consequently, high emission intensity. The emission intensity of dairy cattle in developing countries ranges from 2 to 9 kg CO2-eq/kg fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) and in only a few cases is below 2 kg CO2-eq/kg FPCM. In sub-Saharan Africa, the average emission intensity is 7.5 kg CO2-eq/kg FPCM for dairy cattle, 71 kg CO2-eq/kg of carcass weight for beef cattle, 6.9 kg CO2-eq/kg FPCM for sheep and goats, and 5 kg CO2-eq/kg eggs for chickens. Taking into account the limited economic and technical resources in most developing countries, the application of appropriate mitigation tools is recommended to reduce the emissions of CH4 and N2O gases in the atmosphere. Increasing livestock productivity through selection and feeding is the most effective tool to reduce emission intensity.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 280
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review
    Gerber, P. J.
    Hristov, A. N.
    Henderson, B.
    Makkar, H.
    Oh, J.
    Lee, C.
    Meinen, R.
    Montes, F.
    Ott, T.
    Firkins, J.
    Rotz, A.
    Dell, C.
    Adesogan, A. T.
    Yang, W. Z.
    Tricarico, J. M.
    Kebreab, E.
    Waghorn, G.
    Dijkstra, J.
    Oosting, S.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2013, 7 : 220 - 234
  • [2] Indian methane and nitrous oxide emissions and mitigation flexibility
    Garg, A
    Shukla, PR
    Kapshe, M
    Menon, D
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (13) : 1965 - 1977
  • [3] Estimation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Indian livestock
    Patra, Amlan K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2012, 14 (10): : 2673 - 2684
  • [4] Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural fields in Japan and mitigation options: a review
    Akiyama, Hiroko
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2024, 70 (02) : 79 - 87
  • [5] Challenges in the measurement of emissions of nitrous oxide and methane from livestock sector
    Araceli D. Larios
    Satinder Kaur Brar
    Antonio Avalos Ramírez
    Stéphane Godbout
    Fabiola Sandoval-Salas
    Joahnn H. Palacios
    [J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2016, 15 : 285 - 297
  • [6] Challenges in the measurement of emissions of nitrous oxide and methane from livestock sector
    Larios, Araceli D.
    Brar, Satinder Kaur
    Ramirez, Antonio Avalos
    Godbout, Stephane
    Sandoval-Salas, Fabiola
    Palacios, Joahnn H.
    [J]. REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 15 (02) : 285 - 297
  • [7] Direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions of monogastric livestock in South Africa
    du Toit, C. J. L.
    van Niekerk, W. A.
    Meissner, H. H.
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 43 (03) : 362 - 375
  • [8] Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Canadian dairy farms and mitigation options: An updated review
    Jayasundara, Susantha
    Appuhamy, J. A. D. Ranga Niroshan
    Kebreab, Ermias
    Wagner-Riddle, Claudia
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 96 (03) : 306 - 331
  • [9] Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from waste, energy and industry
    Delhotal, K. Casey
    de la Chesnaye, Francisco C.
    Gardiner, Ann
    Bates, Judith
    Sankovski, Alexei
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2006, : 45 - 62
  • [10] Mitigation Options for Methane, Nitrous Oxide and Nitric Oxide Emissions from Agricultural Ecosystems
    Zheng X.
    Wang M.
    Wang Y.
    Shen R.
    Li J.
    Heyer J.
    Koegge M.
    Papen H.
    Jin J.
    Li L.
    [J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2000, 17 (1) : 83 - 92