LESSONS LEARNED IN REVIEWING CCF EVENTS

被引:0
|
作者
Mossa, Ashley [1 ]
Weston, Rupert [1 ]
机构
[1] Westinghouse Elect Corp, Windsor, CT 06095 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has an ongoing Common Cause Failure (CCF) data analysis program that periodically collects and evaluates information on component failures at U.S. commercial Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs). The primary information sources include the Licensee Event Reports (LER) and records from the Equipment Performance Information Exchange (EPIX) program. Once the information is collected, the failure records are evaluated to identify potential CCF events. CCF events are then coded, reviewed, and loaded into the NRC's database. Verification of the CCF events is performed with the intended purpose of ensuring that events entered into the CCF database are indeed CCF events and that the event coding is consistent and correct. To ensure technical accuracy and correctness of the events loaded into the CCF database, the NRC requested the Pressurized Water Reactors Owners Group (PWROG) support in reviewing these events. Reviews of multiple data sets of CCF events were conducted on behalf of the PWROG. The data sets included CCF events that have occurred at U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. CCF events that occurred during 2006 through 2007 were included in the most recent data set that was reviewed. The level of information provided for reported CCF events varies from utility-to-utility. Without utility participation or input, the lack of consistency and varying level of detail can lead to incorrect interpretation and classification of a CCF event regarding its Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) impact. This paper offers lessons learned from the reviews that were conducted. Insights for improving the consistency and level of detail related to the PRA information are summarized in this paper. The leading causes of initial misclassification of CCF events and patterns observed in conducting the reviews are discussed. The resolutions of misclassified CCF events are also discussed as part of the evaluation process to enhance the pedigree of the CCF database.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 717
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reflections and lessons learned on academic writing and reviewing
    Linberg, Elisabeth
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2021, 35 (02) : 341 - 342
  • [2] Lessons learned from reviewing research in GIS education
    Baker, TR
    Bednarz, SW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY, 2003, 102 (06) : 231 - 233
  • [3] Lessons learned from safety events
    Weiner, Steven C.
    Fassbender, Linda L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (22) : 17358 - 17363
  • [4] Reviewing the evidence for biosimilars: key insights, lessons learned and future horizons
    Uhlig, Till
    Goll, Guro L.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 56 : 49 - 62
  • [5] Engineering Events in CPS - Experiences and Lessons Learned
    Ollesch, Julius
    Hesenius, Marc
    Gruhn, Volker
    [J]. 2017 IEEE/ACM 3RD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING FOR SMART CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS (SESCPS 2017), 2017, : 3 - 9
  • [6] Lessons Learned from MRI Safety Events
    Watson R.E.
    [J]. Current Radiology Reports, 3 (10)
  • [7] LESSONS LEARNED FROM GENERATOR TRIPPING EVENTS
    Mozina, Charles J.
    [J]. IEEE INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2010, 16 (05) : 29 - 36
  • [8] Ethical lessons learned and to be learned from mass casualty events by terrorism
    Strous, Rael D.
    Gold, Azgad
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 32 (02) : 174 - 178
  • [9] Can lessons be learned from reviewing peri-operative cardiac arrests?
    Scott, D. A.
    Phan, T. D.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 79 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [10] What Lessons Can Be Learned from the Austrian Events?
    Sarny, Stephanie
    Habermann, Walter
    Ossimitz, Guenther
    Stammberger, Heinz
    [J]. ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2013, 75 (03): : 175 - 181