Evaluation of the Internal and Borehole Resistances during Thermal Response Tests and Impact on Ground Heat Exchanger Design

被引:13
|
作者
Lamarche, Louis [1 ]
Raymond, Jasmin [2 ]
Pambou, Claude Hugo Koubikana [2 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Technol Super, Genie Mecan, Montreal, PQ H3C 1K3, Canada
[2] Inst Natl Rech Sci, Ctr Eau Terre Environm, Quebec City, PQ G1K 9A9, Canada
来源
ENERGIES | 2018年 / 11卷 / 01期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
geothermal; heat pumps; thermal response tests; ground heat exchangers; borehole resistances;
D O I
10.3390/en11010038
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The main parameters evaluated with a conventional thermal response test (TRT) are the subsurface thermal conductivity surrounding the borehole and the effective borehole thermal resistance, when averaging the inlet and outlet temperature of a ground heat exchanger with the arithmetic mean. This effective resistance depends on two resistances: the 2D borehole resistance (R-b) and the 2D internal resistance (R-a) which is associated to the short-circuit effect between pipes in the borehole. This paper presents a field method to evaluate these two components separately. Two approaches are proposed. In the first case, the temperature at the bottom of the borehole is measured at the same time as the inlet and outlet temperatures as done in a conventional TRT. In the second case, different flow rates are used during the experiment to infer the internal resistance. Both approaches assumed a predefined temperature profile inside the borehole. The methods were applied to real experimental tests and compared with numerical simulations. Interesting results were found by comparison with theoretical resistances calculated with the multipole method. The motivation for this work is evidenced by analyzing the impact of the internal resistance on a typical geothermal system design. It is shown to be important to know both resistance components to predict the variation of the effective resistance when the flow rate and the height of the boreholes are changed during the design process.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of ground temperature response of energy pile and borehole heat exchanger during thermal response tests
    Luo, Jin
    Zhao, Haifeng
    Gui, Shuqiqang
    Xiang, Wei
    Rohn, Joachim
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2016, 75 (22)
  • [2] Comparison of ground temperature response of energy pile and borehole heat exchanger during thermal response tests
    Jin Luo
    Haifeng Zhao
    Shuqiqang Gui
    Wei Xiang
    Joachim Rohn
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75
  • [3] Thermal response testing of a multiple borehole ground heat exchanger
    Javed, Saqib
    Fahlen, Per
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 6 (02) : 141 - 148
  • [4] Multipole method to calculate borehole thermal resistances in a borehole heat exchanger
    Claesson, Johan
    Hellstrom, Goran
    HVAC&R RESEARCH, 2011, 17 (06): : 895 - 911
  • [5] Evaluation of the impact of the thermal shunt effect on the U-pipe ground borehole heat exchanger performance
    Sandler, Stanislawa
    Zajaczkowski, Bartosz
    Bialko, Boguslaw
    Malecha, Ziemowit M.
    GEOTHERMICS, 2017, 65 : 244 - 254
  • [6] Study on the representative borehole in ground heat exchanger design
    Cui, Ping
    Lin, Yun
    Fang, Zhaohong
    Sun, Liangliang
    8TH INTERNATIONAL COLD CLIMATE HVAC CONFERENCE, 2016, 146 : 578 - 584
  • [7] Distributed thermal response tests on a multi-pipe coaxial borehole heat exchanger
    Acuna, Jose
    Mogensen, Palne
    Palm, Bjorn
    HVAC&R RESEARCH, 2011, 17 (06): : 1012 - 1029
  • [8] Ground thermal response to borehole ground heat exchangers
    Mikhaylova, O.
    Johnston, I. W.
    Narsilio, G. A.
    ENERGY GEOTECHNICS, 2016, : 179 - 186
  • [9] Thermal Analysis of the Ground Properties with a Single Borehole Heat Exchanger
    王尧萍
    周亚素
    JournalofDonghuaUniversity(EnglishEdition), 2010, 27 (05) : 610 - 613
  • [10] Thermal response test use of a borehole heat exchanger
    Saljnikov, Aleksandar
    Goricanec, Darko
    Dobersek, Danijela
    Krope, Jurij
    Kozic, Dorde
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND IASME/WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, : 5 - +