Simple action planning can affect attentional allocation in subsequent visual search

被引:1
|
作者
Han, Seohee [1 ]
Ji, Eunhee [1 ]
Choe, Eunhye [1 ]
Kim, Dogyun [1 ]
Kim, Min-Shik [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Psychol, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Attention; Visual search; Action planning; Action effect; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; MENTAL PRACTICE; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; WORKING-MEMORY; TOP-DOWN; POP-OUT; SELECTION; REPRESENTATIONS; PERCEPTION; IMAGERY;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-020-01758-z
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Previous research has shown that mental representations of actions can influence performance on relevant tasks or dimensions even when there is no overt execution of the action. In this study, we examined whether cognitive processes prior to the physical execution of an action can elicit attentional bias towards irrelevant tasks or dimensions of that action. Participants performed two independent tasks-an action task and a search task-where they were instructed to plan an action and execute the action following the visual search task. We found that the same features of the object were prioritized in the subsequent search task when participants had planned an action response on the object in comparison to when they had not. This effect occurred even when the feature was irrelevant to the tasks or required action. Furthermore, the effect of action planning without physical response was found to be comparable to the effect of physical response. These results suggest that planning of a simple action can induce attentional bias to irrelevant features of objects even without physical action.
引用
收藏
页码:1014 / 1024
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Simple action planning can affect attentional allocation in subsequent visual search
    Seohee Han
    Eunhee Ji
    Eunhye Choe
    Dogyun Kim
    Min-Shik Kim
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2020, 27 : 1014 - 1024
  • [2] Dynamics of attentional allocation to targets and distractors during visual search
    Forschack, Norman
    Gundlach, Christopher
    Hillyard, Steven
    Mueller, Matthias M.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2022, 264
  • [3] The effect of anxiety on anticipation, allocation of attentional resources, and visual search behaviours
    Alder, D. B.
    Ford, P. R.
    Causer, J.
    Williams, A. M.
    [J]. HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 61 : 81 - 89
  • [4] Effects of action on asymmetries of attentional allocation across the vertical visual field
    Naito, H.
    Kimura, T.
    Miura, T.
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 2008, 37 : 54 - 54
  • [5] Efficient allocation of attentional sensitivity gain in visual cortex reduces foveal sensitivity in visual search
    Walshe, R. Calen
    Geisler, Wilson S.
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (01) : 26 - +
  • [6] Optimal attentional allocation in the presence of capacity constraints in uncued and cued visual search
    Bates, Christopher J.
    Jacobs, Robert A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2021, 21 (05): : 1 - 23
  • [7] Decomposing the action effect: How simple actions affect subsequent perception
    Blaire J. Weidler
    Richard A. Abrams
    [J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2014, 76 : 1242 - 1252
  • [8] Decomposing the action effect: How simple actions affect subsequent perception
    Weidler, Blaire J.
    Abrams, Richard A.
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2014, 76 (04) : 1242 - 1252
  • [9] No Attentional Capture for Simple Visual Search: Evidence for a Dual-Route Account
    Chan, Louis K. H.
    Hayward, William G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2014, 40 (06) : 2154 - 2166
  • [10] Visual search and visual lobe size: can training on one affect the other?
    Gramopadhye, AK
    Drury, CG
    Jiang, X
    Sreenivasan, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2002, 30 (03) : 181 - 195