Misdirected attentional focus in functional tremor

被引:17
|
作者
Huys, Anne-Catherine M. L. [1 ]
Haggard, Patrick [2 ]
Bhatia, Kailash P. [1 ]
Edwards, Mark J. [3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Clin & Movement Neurosci, Queen Sq Inst Neurol, 33 Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] UCL, Inst Cognit Neurosci, London WC1N 3AZ, England
[3] St Georges Univ London, Inst Mol & Cell Sci, Neurosci Res Ctr, London SW17 0QT, England
来源
BRAIN | 2021年 / 144卷
关键词
attention; functional movement disorder; functional neurological disorder; visual feedback; treatment; VISUAL FEEDBACK; MOTOR SYMPTOMS; EMG ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT; SEQUENCES; PROGNOSIS; ANATOMY; SENSE; SELF;
D O I
10.1093/brain/awab230
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
A characteristic and intriguing feature of functional neurological disorder is that symptoms typically manifest with attention and improve or disappear with distraction. Attentional phenomena are therefore likely to be important in functional neurological disorder, but exactly how this manifests is unknown. The aim of the study was to establish whether in functional tremor the attentional focus is misdirected, and whether this misdirection is detrimental to the movement, or rather reflects a beneficial compensatory strategy. Patients with a functional action tremor, between the ages of 21-75, were compared to two age and gender matched control groups: healthy control participants and patients with an organic action tremor. The groups included between 17 and 28 participants. First, we compared the natural attentional focus on different aspects of a reaching movement (target, ongoing visual feedback, proprioceptive-motor aspect). This revealed that the attentional focus in the functional tremor group, in contrast to both control groups, was directed to ongoing visual feedback from the movement. Next, we established that all groups were able to shift their attentional focus to different aspects of the reaching movement when instructed. Subsequently, the impact of attentional focus on the ongoing visual feedback on movement performance was evaluated under several conditions: the reaching movement was performed with direct, or indirect visual feedback, without any visual feedback, under three different instruction conditions (as accurately as possible/very slowly/very quickly) and finally as a preparatory movement that was supposedly of no importance. Low trajectory length and low movement duration were taken as measures of good motor performance. For all three groups, motor performance deteriorated with attention to indirect visual feedback, to accuracy and when instructed to move slowly. It improved without visual feedback and when instructed to move fast. Motor performance improved, in participants with functional tremor only, when the movement was performed as a preparatory movement without any apparent importance. In addition to providing experimental evidence for improvement with distraction, we found that the normal allocation of attention during aimed movement is altered in functional tremor. Attention is disproportionately directed towards the ongoing visual feedback from the moving hand. This altered attentional focus may be partly responsible for the tremor, since it also worsens motor performance in healthy control participants and patients with an organic action tremor. It may have its detrimental impact through interference with automatic movement processes, due to a maladaptive shift from lower- to higher-level motor control circuitry.
引用
收藏
页码:3436 / 3450
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Internal focus cue specificity: Are the benefits of an external focus a function of a misdirected internal focus?
    Coker, Cheryl A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 37 : S35 - S35
  • [2] Misdirected by the gap: The relationship between inattentional blindness and attentional misdirection
    Kuhn, Gustav
    Tatler, Benjamin W.
    [J]. CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2011, 20 (02) : 432 - 436
  • [3] The control of the attentional focus
    Maringelli, F
    Umilta, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 10 (03): : 225 - 246
  • [4] Feedback and attentional focus
    Wulf, G
    [J]. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2002, 73 (01) : A42 - A42
  • [5] MOVEMENT OF ATTENTIONAL FOCUS
    KONTSEVICH, LL
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 1989, 18 (04) : 520 - 520
  • [6] Functional Tremor: Palatal Tremor
    Dibek, Dilara Mermi
    Bulut, Onur
    Colakoglu, Berril Donmez
    Cakmur, Ralf
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2020, 26 (04) : 357 - 358
  • [7] THE EFFECTS OF ATTENTIONAL FOCUS AND PARTNER AROUSAL ON SEXUAL RESPONDING IN FUNCTIONAL AND DYSFUNCTIONAL MEN
    BECK, JG
    BARLOW, DH
    SAKHEIM, DK
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1983, 21 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [8] Fashion focus: neurosurgery for tremor
    Zrinzo, Ludvic
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 92 (05): : 459 - 459
  • [9] MESENCEPHALIC FOCUS RESPONSIBLE FOR TREMOR
    METTLER, FA
    [J]. ANATOMICAL RECORD, 1965, 151 (03): : 499 - &
  • [10] Functional tremor
    Schwingenschuh, Petra
    Espay, Alberto J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 435