Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys

被引:8
|
作者
Buerger, Jana [1 ]
Kuzmic, Filip [2 ]
Silc, Urban [2 ]
Jansen, Florian [3 ]
Bergmeier, Erwin [4 ]
Chytry, Milan [5 ]
Cirujeda, Alicia [6 ]
Fogliatto, Silvia [7 ]
Fried, Guillaume [8 ]
Dostatny, Denise F. [9 ]
Gerowitt, Baerbel [1 ]
Glemnitz, Michael [10 ]
Gonzalez-Andujar, Jose L. [11 ]
Plaza, Eva Hernandez [11 ]
Izquierdo, Jordi [12 ]
Kolarova, Michaela [13 ]
Lososova, Zdenka [5 ]
Metcalfe, Helen [14 ]
Necajeva, Jevgenija [15 ]
Petit, Sandrine [16 ]
Pinke, Gyula [17 ]
Rasomavicius, Valerijus [18 ]
Redwitz, Christoph [19 ]
Schumacher, Matthias [20 ]
Ulber, Lena [19 ]
Vidotto, Francesco [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rostock, Fac Agr & Environm Sci, Crop Hlth, Rostock, Germany
[2] Slovenian Acad Sci & Arts ZRC SAZU, Res Ctr, Jovan Hadzi Inst Biol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Rostock, Fac Agr & Environm Sci, Landscape Ecol, Rostock, Germany
[4] Georg August Univ Gottingen, Dept Vegetat & Phytodivers Anal, Gottingen, Germany
[5] Masaryk Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Bot & Zool, Brno, Czech Republic
[6] Agrifood Res & Technol Ctr Aragon CITA, Plant Protect, Zaragoza, Spain
[7] Univ Turin, Dept Agr Forest & Food Sci DISAFA, Grugliasco, Italy
[8] Plant Hlth Lab, Anses, Montferrier Sur, France
[9] Natl Ctr Plant Genet Resources, Plant Breeding & Acclimatizat Inst, Natl Res Inst, Blonie, Poland
[10] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res, Muncheberg, Germany
[11] CSIC, Inst Agr Sostenible, Cordoba, Spain
[12] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Agrifood Engn & Biotechnol, Castelldefels, Spain
[13] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Fac Agrobiol Food & Nat Resources, Dept Agroecol & Crop Prod, Prague, Czech Republic
[14] Rothamsted Res, Sustainable Agr Sci, Harpenden, Herts, England
[15] Latvia Univ Life Sci & Technol, Inst Plant Protect Res Agrihorts, Jelgava, Latvia
[16] Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, INRAE, AgroSup Dijon, Agroecol, Dijon, France
[17] Szechenyi Istvan Univ, Fac Agr & Food Sci, Mosonmagyarovsr, Hungary
[18] Inst Bot, Nat Res Ctr, Vilnius, Lithuania
[19] Julius Kuehn Inst, Fed Res Ctr Cultivated Plants, Inst Plant Protect Field Crops & Grassland, Braunschweig, Germany
[20] Univ Hohenheim, Fac Agr Sci, Inst Phytomed, Dept Weed Sci, Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
agriculture; arable weeds; Arable Weeds and Management in Europe data collection; European Weed Vegetation database; phytosociology; segetal plants; species richness; vegetation survey; vegetation-plot data; weed survey; FARMLAND BIODIVERSITY; SPECIES COMPOSITION; PLOT DATABASES; CROP EDGES; DIVERSITY; FIELDS; GERMANY; SITE;
D O I
10.1111/avsc.12460
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Questions Two scientific disciplines, vegetation science and weed science, study arable weed vegetation, which has seen a strong diversity decrease in Europe over the last decades. We compared two collections of plot-based vegetation records originating from these two disciplines. The aim was to check the suitability of the collections for joint analysis and for addressing research questions from the opposing domains. We asked: are these collections complementary? If so, how can they be used for joint analysis? Location Europe. Methods We compared 13 311 phytosociological releves and 13 328 records from weed science, concerning both data collection properties and the recorded species richness. To deal with bias in the data, we also analysed different subsets (i.e., crops, geographical regions, organic vs conventional fields, center vs edge plots). Results Records from vegetation science have an average species number of 19.0 +/- 10.4. Metadata on survey methodology or agronomic practices are rare in this collection. Records from weed science have an average species number of 8.5 +/- 6.4. They are accompanied by extensive methodological information. Vegetation science records and the weed science records taken at field edges or from organic fields have similar species numbers. The collections cover different parts of Europe but the results are consistent in six geographical subsets and the overall data set. The difference in species numbers may be caused by differences in methodology between the disciplines, i.e., plot positioning within fields, plot sizes, or survey timing. Conclusion This comparison of arable weed data that were originally sampled with a different purpose represents a new effort in connecting research between vegetation scientists and weed scientists. Both collections show different aspects of weed vegetation, which means the joint use of the data is valuable as it can contribute to a more complete picture of weed species diversity in European arable landscapes.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Weed vegetation of arable land in Central Europe:: Gradients of diversity and species composition
    Lososová, Z
    Chytry, M
    Cimalová, S
    Kropac, Z
    Otypková, Z
    Pysek, P
    Tichy, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (03) : 415 - 422
  • [2] The utility of the 'Arable Weeds and Management in Europe' database: Challenges and opportunities of combining weed survey data at a European scale
    Metcalfe, Helen
    Buerger, Jana
    von Redwitz, Christoph
    Cirujeda, Alicia
    Fogliatto, Silvia
    Dostatny, Denise F.
    Gerowitt, Barbel
    Glemnitz, Michael
    Gonzalez-Andujar, Jose L.
    Plaza, Eva Hernandez
    Izquierdo, Jordi
    Kolarova, Michaela
    Necajeva, Jevgenija
    Petit, Sandrine
    Pinke, Gyula
    Schumacher, Matthias
    Ulber, Lena
    Vidotto, Francesco
    Fried, Guillaume
    [J]. WEED RESEARCH, 2023, 63 (01) : 1 - 11