Epidemiological investigation of vascular etiological examinations in the diagnosis and treatment of lower-extremity ulcers in China

The vascular causes of lower-extremity ulcers cannot be neglected because they can directly affect treatment methods. No detailed epidemiological statistics have described vascular etiological diagnosis in China. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of clinical vascular etiological examination of lower-extremity ulcers and improve the diagnosis and treatment effectiveness of lower-extremity ulcers. Data were collected from the WoundCareLog database, which includes 2413 cases of lower-extremity ulcers from 478 hospitals nationwide. Data analysis revealed that 1698 (70.4%) lower-extremity blood flow examinations (including physical examination [PE] and assistant examinations [AE]) were performed, of which 61.7% were PE, 10.4% were AE only, and 27.9% were the combined PE and AE[PAE]. The proportion of nonexaminations was higher in the nondiabetic group than in the diabetic group (chi(2) = 34.5; P < .01). The positive rates of vascular etiological examination in the diabetic and nondiabetic groups were 69.7% and 70.7%, respectively. Among the four economic regions of China, there were statistically significant differences in the use of the different examination methods. The examination of vascular diseases in lower-extremity ulcers in China has not been fully popularized and requires improvement; there was no statistically significant difference between examination rates by doctors and nurses, which is mainly based on PE. However, PE has certain rates of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. The false-positive and false-negative rates were 25.7% and 57.6%, respectively. The use of an AE can compensate for this deficiency by making diagnosis more precise, while the quantitative diagnostic criteria allow disease diagnosis to transcend geographical and operator differences and maximize uniformity. The vascular B-ultrasound examination is more suitable for the medical environment in China because of its mature technology, high hospital penetration rate, and low cost.