Emergent Curbside Intercity Bus Industry Chinatown and Beyond

被引:9
|
作者
Klein, Nicholas J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Edward J Bloustein Sch Planning & Publ Policy, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2111-11
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The first study of the emerging curbside intercity bus industry, commonly called the Chinatown bus, is presented. The study of this relatively unknown industry addresses three research questions. First, why and how did the intercity curbside bus industry develop? Second, what services are operated by the curbside carriers and how do these services compare with competing travel options? Finally, how do the economics of operating curbside buses differ from those of traditional bus companies? The research speaks to policy questions about the appropriate role of regulation in transportation and the competition between private and public transportation providers. The findings indicate that in the past 10 years, curbside buses have grown to become an important transportation provider in the Northeast Corridor: more than 2,500 low-fare bus trips per week connect New York City to Washington, D.C.; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Boston, Massachusetts. More than 100 buses depart each week to more than 30 other cities, traveling as far as Atlanta, Georgia, and Toronto, Canada. Traditional bus companies, such as Greyhound Lines and Peter Pan, have begun their own curbside intercity bus services either to mitigate the competition from new companies or because they recognize the competitive advantages of curbside operations. It is found that curbside bus operations offer significant cost savings compared with traditional bus services by lowering labor costs and avoiding terminal fees, although at the cost of limited accessibility for disabled passengers, reduced passenger safety, and other social concerns.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 89
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Get on the (curbside) bus: The new intercity bus
    Klein, Nicholas J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT AND LAND USE, 2015, 8 (01) : 155 - 169
  • [2] COST-STRUCTURE OF THE INTERCITY BUS INDUSTRY
    TAUCHEN, H
    FRAVEL, FD
    GILBERT, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 1983, 17 (01) : 25 - 47
  • [3] Aerodynamics of an intercity bus
    Sharma, Rajnish
    Chadwick, Daniel
    Haines, Jonathan
    [J]. WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2008, 11 (04) : 257 - 273
  • [4] Intercity Bus Transportation
    Hill, Arthur M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1943, 230 : 71 - 77
  • [5] Intercity Bus Occupant Safety
    Cantor Mexquititla, V. M.
    Rivera-Hernandez, M. A.
    Torres-San Miguel, C. R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF I4SDG WORKSHOP 2021: IFTOMM FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS, 2022, 108 : 182 - 192
  • [6] CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CUSTOMER LOYALTY IN TAIWAN'S INTERCITY BUS INDUSTRY
    Chang, Yu-Hern
    Yeh, Chung-Hsing
    Su, Chen
    [J]. INNOVATION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABLE VALUE CHAIN IN A DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT, 2015, : 2527 - 2529
  • [7] On the capacity of isolated, curbside bus stops
    Gu, Weihua
    Li, Yuwei
    Cassidy, Michael J.
    Griswold, Julia B.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2011, 45 (04) : 714 - 723
  • [8] Models of Bus Queueing at Curbside Stops
    Gu, Weihua
    Cassidy, Michael J.
    Li, Yuwei
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 49 (02) : 204 - 212
  • [9] Intercity bus rollover simulation
    Castejón, L
    Miravete, A
    Larrodé, E
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VEHICLE DESIGN, 2001, 26 (2-3) : 204 - 217
  • [10] Bus service time estimation model for a curbside bus stop
    Bian, Bomin
    Zhu, Ning
    Ling, Shuai
    Ma, Shoufeng
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, 57 : 103 - 121