Analysis of renewable energy subsidy in China under uncertainty: Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard

被引:48
|
作者
Yang, Dong-xiao [1 ]
Jing, Ya-qiang [2 ]
Wang, Chan [3 ]
Nie, Pu-yan [3 ]
Sun, Peng [4 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Technol & Business, Coll Econ & Trade, Changsha 410205, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ GDUFE, Sch Finance, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ GDUFE, Sch Finance, Inst Guangdong Econ & Social Dev, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
[4] Hainan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Haikou 570228, Hainan, Peoples R China
关键词
Feed-in tariff; Renewable portfolio standard; Renewable energy; Uncertainty;
D O I
10.1016/j.esr.2021.100628
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Environmental pollution, climate warming and other issues have become global issues, and the use of renewable energy as the best way to solve the problem has gradually attracted the attention of all countries. Uncertainty has an important effect on the production of renewable energy. Through a two-stage model, this paper compares the effects of feed-in tariff (FIT) and renewable portfolio standard (RPS) in the developing renewable energy industry under uncertainty. The results show that the FIT have higher expected output and profit, and lower market prices. The risks of production and gain is of relatively more significant. By contrast, the production and profit of RPS remain relatively more stable. When the cost of renewable energy is high, the incentive effect of the policy under FIT is better. As the cost decreases, the incentive effect under RPS will continually increase. In summary, at low cost, the output of renewable energy is proportional to the intensity of the policy under the two policies. We can further conclude that FIT is suitable for the early stage of the development of the renewable energy industry. Once the industry is mature, we can strategically integrate FIT and RPS to ensure a healthy and sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rent and rent-seeking in renewable energy support policies: Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard
    Kwon, Tae-hyeong
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 44 : 676 - 681
  • [2] A comparative study of feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard policy in renewable energy industry
    Sun, Peng
    Nie, Pu-yan
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 74 : 255 - 262
  • [3] Effect Analysis of the Feed-in Tariff of Renewable Energy in China
    Zhao, Xingang
    Yang, Yahui
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOCIAL SCIENCE (ISSS-15), 2015, 24 : 81 - 85
  • [4] Analysis of the promotion of onshore wind energy in the EU: Feed-in tariff or renewable portfolio standard?
    Teresa Garcia-Alvarez, Maria
    Cabeza-Garcia, Laura
    Soares, Isabel
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 111 : 256 - 264
  • [5] Overall review of feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard policy: A perspective of China
    Yan, Q. Y.
    Zhang, Q.
    Yang, L.
    Wang, X.
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEW ENERGY AND FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEM (NEFES 2016), 2016, 40
  • [6] Which policy can promote renewable energy to achieve grid parity? Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standards
    Zhao Xin-gang
    Li Pei-ling
    Zhou Ying
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 162 : 322 - 333
  • [7] The Development of the Renewable Energy Power Industry under Feed-In Tariff and Renewable Portfolio Standard: A Case Study of China's Photovoltaic Power Industry
    Zhang, Yuzhuo
    Zhao, Xingang
    Zuo, Yi
    Ren, Lingzhi
    Wang, Ling
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (04):
  • [8] The development of the renewable energy power industry under feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard: A case study of China's wind power industry
    Zhang Yu-zhuo
    Zhao Xin-gang
    Ren Ling-zhi
    Zuo Yi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 168 : 1262 - 1276
  • [9] The development of China's biomass power industry under feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard: A system dynamics analysis
    Zhang Yu-zhuo
    Zhao Xin-gang
    Ren Ling-zhi
    Liang Ji
    Liu Ping-kuo
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 139 : 947 - 961
  • [10] Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard: An empirical test of their relative effectiveness in promoting wind capacity development
    Dong, C. G.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 42 : 476 - 485