Is Utilitarianism Risky? How the Same Antecedents and Mechanism Produce Both Utilitarian and Risky Choices

被引:18
|
作者
Lucas, Brian J. [1 ]
Galinsky, Adam D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Columbia Business Sch, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
utilitarianism; deontology; moral judgment; risk taking; affect regulation; ORBITOFRONTAL CORTEX DYSFUNCTION; POSITIVE AFFECT; EMOTION REGULATION; RESPONSE REVERSAL; MORAL JUDGMENTS; POWER; TESTOSTERONE; DAMAGE; CONSEQUENCES; INHIBITION;
D O I
10.1177/1745691615583130
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Philosophers and psychologists have long been interested in identifying factors that influence moral judgment. In the current analysis, we compare the literatures on moral psychology and decision making under uncertainty to propose that utilitarian choices are driven by the same forces that lead to risky choices. Spanning from neurocognitive to hormonal to interpersonal levels of analysis, we identify six antecedents that increase both utilitarian and risky choices (ventromedial prefrontal cortex brain lesions, psychopathology, testosterone, incidental positive affect, power, and social connection) and one antecedent that reduces these choices (serotonin activity). We identify the regulation of negative affect as a common mechanism through which the effects of each antecedent on utilitarian and risky choices are explained. By demonstrating that the same forces and the same underlying mechanism that produce risky choices also promote utilitarian choices, we offer a deeper understanding of how basic psychological systems underlie moral judgment.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 548
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条