CBCT-Based Adaptive Assessment Workflow for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

被引:9
|
作者
De Ornelas, Mariluz [1 ]
Xu, Yihang [1 ]
Padgett, Kyle [1 ]
Schmidt, Ryder M. [1 ]
Butkus, Michael [1 ]
Diwanji, Tejan [1 ]
Luciani, Gus [1 ]
Lambiase, Jason [1 ]
Samuels, Stuart [1 ]
Samuels, Michael [1 ]
Dogan, Nesrin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Radiat Oncol, Miller Sch Med, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136 USA
关键词
dose accumulation; IMPT; head and neck cancer; DEFORMABLE IMAGE REGISTRATION; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; DOSE CALCULATION; INTER-FRACTION; OROPHARYNGEAL; FEASIBILITY; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.14338/IJPT-D-20-00056.1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Anatomical changes and patient setup uncertainties during intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) of head and neck (HN) cancers demand frequent evaluation of delivered dose. This work investigated a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and deformable image registration based therapy workflow to demonstrate the feasibility of proton dose calculation on synthetic computed tomography (sCT) for adaptive IMPT treatment of HN cancer. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients with HN cancer were enrolled in this study, a retrospective institutional review board protocol. They had previously been treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy and had daily iterative CBCT. For each patient, robust optimization (RO) IMPT plans were generated using +/- 3 mm patient setup and +/- 3% proton range uncertainties. The sCTs were created and the weekly delivered dose was recalculated using an adaptive dose accumulation workflow in which the planning computed tomography (CT) was deformably registered to CBCTs and Hounsfield units transferred from the planning CT. Accumulated doses from +/- 3 mm/+/- 3% RO-IMPT plans were evaluated using clinical dose-volume constraints for targets (clinical target volume, or CTV) and organs at risk. Results: Evaluation of weekly recalculated dose on sCTs showed that most of the patient plans maintained target dose coverage. The primary CTV remained covered by the V95 > 95% (95% of the volume receiving more than 95% of the prescription dose) worst-case scenario for 84.5% of the weekly fractions. The oral cavity accumulated mean dose remained lower than the worst-case scenario for all patients. Parotid accumulated mean dose remained within the uncertainty bands for 18 of the 21 patients, and all were kept lower than RO-IMPT worst-case scenario for 88.7% and 84.5% for left and right parotids, respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that RO-IMPT plans account for most setup and anatomical uncertainties, except for large weight-loss changes that need to be tracked throughout the treatment course. We showed that sCTs could be a powerful decision tool for adaptation of these cases in order to reduce workload when using repeat CTs.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 41
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of CBCT-Based Adaptive Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Using Automated Planning for Head and Neck Cancer
    Xu, Y.
    Dogan, N.
    Padgett, K.
    De Ornelas, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E165 - E166
  • [2] CBCT-Based Adaptive Intensity Modulated Proton Radiotherapy
    Sabouri, P.
    Mundis, M.
    Andersson, S.
    Nilsson, R.
    Eriksson, K.
    Chen, S.
    Mossahebi, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E586 - E586
  • [3] Cross-Platform Assessment of CBCT-Based Dose Evaluations for Head and Neck Cancer Proton Therapy
    Vatterodt, N.
    Elstrom, U. V.
    Korreman, S. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E730 - E731
  • [4] CBCT-Based Dose Monitoring and Adaptive Planning Triggers in Head and Neck PBS Proton Therapy
    Reiners, Keaton
    Dagan, Roi
    Holtzman, Adam
    Bryant, Curtis
    Andersson, Sebastian
    Nilsson, Rasmus
    Hong, Liu
    Johnson, Perry
    Zhang, Yawei
    [J]. CANCERS, 2023, 15 (15)
  • [5] CBCT-Based Plan Adaptation for Chest Wall Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy
    Smith, W.
    Hao, Y.
    Sun, B.
    Darafsheh, A.
    Mazur, T.
    Zhang, T.
    Perkins, S.
    Zhao, T.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [6] Validation of a CBCT-Based Online Evaluation Workflow for Proton Therapy
    Chang, C.
    Nilsson, R.
    Andersson, S.
    Bohannon, D.
    Lin, L.
    Patel, S.
    Patel, P.
    Langen, K.
    Bradley, J.
    Liu, T.
    Yang, X.
    Zhou, J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E871 - E871
  • [7] Clinical suitability of CBCT-based synthetic CTs in proton therapy for head and neck patients
    de Koster, R.
    Thummerer, A.
    Marmitt, G. Guterres
    Scandurra, D.
    Langendijk, H.
    Both, S.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S182 - S183
  • [8] Use of CBCT for Reducing QACT Frequency in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy: Head and Neck
    Yao, W.
    Zhang, B.
    Han, D.
    Polf, J.
    Vedam, S.
    Lasio, G.
    Yi, B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [9] Clinical implementation of on-board CBCT-based adaptive IMRT for head and neck cancer
    Xing, L.
    Lee, L.
    Chao, M.
    Keall, P.
    La, T.
    Le, Q.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S446 - S446
  • [10] An online adaptive plan library approach for intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancer
    Oud, Michelle
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Gizynska, Marta
    Kroesen, Michiel
    Hutschemaekers, Stefan
    Habraken, Steven
    Petit, Steven
    Perko, Zoltan
    Heijmen, Ben
    Hoogeman, Mischa
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 176 : 68 - 75