A review of methods for the assessment of symptom validity: An update 2002 to 2005

被引:11
|
作者
Blaskewitz, N.
Merten, T.
机构
[1] Klinikum Friedrichshain, Neurol Klin, Vivantes Netzwerk Gesundheit, D-10249 Berlin, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Inst Psychol, Berlin, Germany
关键词
symptom validity; malingering; symptom exaggeration; neuropsychological assessment; questionnaires;
D O I
10.1055/s-2006-932204
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Continuing a previous review on problems and strategies for the assessment of negative response bias (Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2002; 70: 126 - 138), an update on research published from 2002 to 2005 is provided. More than 400 journal articles were included in the analysis. It was found that symptom validity tests or effort tests are generally accepted as the one method which is best developed for the assessment of negative response bias. Other methods, including questionnaires and rating methods, are reviewed. Three important applications of symptom validity assessment are analysed in some more detail: retrograde amnesia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and pain. - Research activities in the field of what was previously called "malingering research" have not decreased so further important developments can be expected in the years to come.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 154
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Symptom and Performance Validity Assessment in European Countries: an Update
    Merten, Thomas
    Dandachi-FitzGerald, Brechje
    Hall, Vicki
    Bodner, Thomas
    Giromini, Luciano
    Lehrner, Johann
    Gonzalez-Ordi, Hector
    Santamaria, Pablo
    Schmand, Ben
    Di Stefano, Giuseppe
    PSYCHOLOGICAL INJURY & LAW, 2022, 15 (02): : 116 - 127
  • [2] Symptom and Performance Validity Assessment in European Countries: an Update
    Thomas Merten
    Brechje Dandachi-FitzGerald
    Vicki Hall
    Thomas Bodner
    Luciano Giromini
    Johann Lehrner
    Héctor González-Ordi
    Pablo Santamaría
    Ben Schmand
    Giuseppe Di Stefano
    Psychological Injury and Law, 2022, 15 : 116 - 127
  • [3] A review of the reliability and validity of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System
    Richardson, L. A.
    Jones, G. W.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (01) : 53 - 64
  • [4] Performance and Symptom Validity Testing in Pediatric Assessment: A Review of the Literature
    Emhoff, Stephanie M.
    Lynch, Julie K.
    McCaffrey, Robert J.
    DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 43 (08) : 671 - 707
  • [6] Clinical tests for symptom validity assessment
    Widder, Bernhard
    FORTSCHRITTE DER NEUROLOGIE PSYCHIATRIE, 2017, 85 (12) : 740 - 746
  • [7] Psychological testing and symptom validity assessment
    Merten, Thomas
    Dohrenbusch, Ralf
    PSYCHOTHERAPEUT, 2010, 55 (05): : 394 - +
  • [8] The Assessment of Symptom and Performance Validity in Neurorehabilitation
    Bush, Shane S.
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2015, 36 (04) : 383 - 386
  • [9] Symptom validity testing: A critical review
    Bianchini, KJ
    Mathias, CW
    Greve, KW
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2001, 15 (01) : 19 - 45
  • [10] The Relationship of Cogniphobia to Performance Validity and Symptom Validity in Neuropsychological Assessment
    Lee, Grace J.
    Suhr, Julie
    Henry, George K.
    Heilbronner, Robert L.
    Drane, Daniel L.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 35 (07) : 762 - 769