Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

被引:9
|
作者
Erden, Tunay [1 ]
Toker, Berkin [1 ]
Toprak, Ali [2 ]
Taser, Omer [1 ]
机构
[1] Acibadem Fulya Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Sports Med Ctr, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY | 2021年 / 32卷 / 01期
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; anterolateral ligament; augmentation; knee; ligament augmentation; suture tape; TIBIAL ROTATION; PATELLAR TENDON; FOLLOW-UP; KNEE; INJURY; TENODESIS; STABILITY; ANATOMY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.5606/ehc.2020.78201
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: This study aims to compare the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament (ALL) suture tape augmentation (STA) and ACL reconstruction after a minimum follow-up of two years. Patients and methods: This retrospective study included 63 patients (36 males, 27 females; mean age 27.8 +/- 4.0; range, 19 to 35 years) who had unilateral ACL injury and participated in pivoting sports and were randomly assigned to undergo either isolated ACL reconstruction (Group 1, n=33) or combined ACL reconstruction and ALL STA (Group 2, n=30) between January 2015 and February 2018. The presence of an associated meniscal injury, chondral pathology, contralateral ACL rupture, and residual pivot shift; subjective and objective International Knee Documentation Committee scores; Cincinnati and Lysholm functional scores; KT-1000 measurements; and graft rupture rate were evaluated. Results: Patients were followed for a minimum of two years. The groups did not differ with respect to age, sex, side, time from injury to surgery, postoperative follow-up time, ACL graft size, contralateral ACL rupture, graft size, partial meniscectomy, chondral pathology or preoperative physical examination results. A total of 9.1% of the patients in Group 1 and 0% of those in Group 2 presented postoperative positive pivot shift (p=0.357). The graft failure rate was 6.06% (n=2) in Group 1 and 0% in Group 2 (p=0.270). In the final evaluation, compared with Group 1, Group 2 showed better anteroposterior clinical stability, as evaluated by KT-1000 arthrometry (p=0.006). Although better results were observed in Group 2, the clinical evaluation results for postoperative function did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: Combined ALL STA and ACL reconstruction was found to be effective in improving subjective and objective outcomes. Nevertheless, these findings were not significantly superior to those of isolated ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts, except for the side-to-side differential anterior laxity testing results.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 136
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Tape Augmentation
    Daggett, Matt
    Redler, Andrea
    Witte, Kevin
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2018, 7 (04): : E385 - E389
  • [2] Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction
    Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
    Daggett, Matt
    Helito, Camilo Partezani
    Fayard, Jean-Marie
    Thaunat, Mathieu
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2016, 5 (06): : E1253 - E1259
  • [3] Anterolateral Ligament Repair Augmented With Suture Tape in Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Monaco, Edoardo
    Mazza, Daniele
    Redler, Andrea
    Drogo, Piergiorgio
    Wolf, Megan Rianne
    Ferretti, Andrea
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2019, 8 (04): : E369 - E373
  • [4] Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction
    Delaloye, Jean-Romain
    Murar, Jozef
    Vieira, Thais Dutra
    Saithna, Adnan
    Barth, Johannes
    Ouanezar, Herve
    Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2019, 8 (01): : E23 - E29
  • [5] Combined Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction
    Hopper, Graeme P.
    Philippe, Corentin
    El Helou, Abdo
    Gousopoulos, Lampros
    Fradin, Thomas
    Vieira, Thais Dutra
    Saithna, Adnan
    Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2022, 11 (07): : E1269 - E1275
  • [6] Clinical Outcomes After Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction
    Delaloye, Jean-Romain
    Murar, Jozef
    Gonzalez, Mauricio
    Amaral, Thiago
    Kakatkar, Vikram
    Sonnery-Cotte, Bertrand
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 33 (04) : 225 - 231
  • [7] Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Tape Augmentation: A Surgical Technique
    Anderson, Scott Richard
    Youssefzadeh, Keon Ariel
    Limpisvasti, Orr
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2019, 8 (12): : E1579 - E1582
  • [8] Combined Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction
    Mediavilla, Inaki
    Aramberri, Mikel
    Tiso, Giovanni
    Murillo-Gonzalez, Jorge A.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2018, 7 (08): : E881 - E886
  • [9] Modified Technique for Combined Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament
    Jankovic, Sasa
    Vrgoc, Goran
    Vuletic, Filip
    Ivkovic, Alan
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2021, 10 (02): : e599 - e604
  • [10] Comparable rates of secondary surgery between anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    G. P. Hopper
    W. T. Wilson
    L. O’Donnell
    C. Hamilton
    M. J. G. Blyth
    G. M. MacKay
    [J]. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 9