共 50 条
Revisiting the definition of dose-limiting toxicities in paediatric oncology phase I clinical trials: An analysis from the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer Consortium
被引:6
|作者:
Bautista, Francisco
[1
]
Moreno, Lucas
[1
]
Marshall, Lynley
[2
]
Pearson, Andrew D. J.
[2
]
Geoerger, Birgit
[3
,4
]
Paoletti, Xavier
[5
,6
]
机构:
[1] Hosp Infantil Univ Nino Jesus, Clin Res Unit, Pediat Oncol Hematol & Stem Cell Transplant Dept, Ave Menendez Pelayo 65, Madrid 28009, Spain
[2] Royal Marsden Hosp, Pediat Drug Dev Team, Div Canc Therapeut & Clin Studies, Inst Canc Res, Sutton SM2 5NG, Surrey, England
[3] Gustave Roussy, Pediat & Adolescent Oncol, Villejuif, France
[4] Univ Paris Saclay, Univ Paris Sud, CNRS UMR8203, Villejuif, France
[5] Gustave Roussy, Biostat & Epidemiol Unit, Villejuif, France
[6] Univ Paris Saclay, Univ Paris Sud, INSERM U1018, CESP, Villejuif, France
关键词:
Dose-limiting toxicity;
Recommended phase II dose;
Maximum tolerated dose;
Dose-finding clinical trials;
Early drug development;
Paediatrics;
Oncology;
MOLECULARLY TARGETED AGENTS;
ERLOTINIB;
CONDUCT;
ADULTS;
TUMORS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.015
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background: Dose-escalation trials aim to identify the maximum tolerated dose and, importantly, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and rely on the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first treatment cycle. Molecularly targeted agents (MTAs) often follow continuous and prolonged administrations, displaying a distinct toxicity profile compared to conventional chemotherapeutics, and classical DLT criteria might not be appropriate to evaluate MTAs' toxicity. We investigated this issue in children. Methods: The Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer Consortium (ITCC) phase I trials of novel anticancer agents between 2004 and 2015 were analysed. Data from investigational product, trial design, items defining DLT/RP2D were extracted. A survey on dose-escalation process, DLTs and RP2D definition was conducted among the ITCC clinical trials committee members. Results: Thirteen phase I trials with 15 dose-escalation cohorts were analysed. They explored 11 MTAs and 2 novel cytotoxics; 12 evaluated DLT during cycle 1. Definition of DLT was heterogeneous: Grade III-IV haematologic toxicities that were transient or asymptomatic and grade III-IV non-haematological toxicities manageable with adequate supportive care were often excluded, whereas some included dose intensity or grade II toxicities into DLT. None of the studies considered delayed toxicity into the RP2D definition. Conclusion: DLTs should be homogeneously defined across trials, limiting the number of exceptions due to specific toxicities. Dose escalation should still be based on safety data from cycle 1, but delayed and overall toxicities, pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic data should be considered to refine the final RP2D. The evaluation of long-term toxicity in the developing child cannot be adequately addressed in early trials. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 284
页数:10
相关论文