The impact of obstetric risk factors and socioeconomic characteristics on utilization of antenatal care

被引:3
|
作者
Berglund, A [1 ]
Lindmark, G
机构
[1] Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, SE-72189 Vasteras, Sweden
[2] Akad Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE | 1998年 / 20卷 / 04期
关键词
antenatal care; risk factors; utilization of care;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024802
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The objective of the study is to assess the impact of obstetric risk status and defined risk factors on utilization of antenatal care in a Swedish county. Methods An area-based, population study was carried out with retrospective review of standardized patient records before (n = 2008) and after (n = 1874) the introduction of a reduced schedule for surveillance of pregnancy. For assessment of individual risk factors a multiple regression model is used. Results Overall the number of contacts per pregnancy decreased from 13.2 to 11.4. With the reduced routine programme the difference between low-risk and high-risk women increased from 1.1 to 2.7 visits on average, In the multiple regression model socioeconomic characteristics had little influence on the use of antenatal care. Previous obstetric complications increased compliance to the schedule after the programme change. Complications during current pregnancy were important for the number of extra visits planned by the staff. Self referrals were most influenced by symptoms but in-patient care was influenced by multiple factors. The total explanatory ability of the regression model was low for time of first visit to the antenatal care unit and referrals for ultrasound examinations. Conclusions With a reduced routine programme the surveillance became better apportioned to obstetric risk. Even a combination of medical or obstetric risk factors with socioeconomic characteristics explain only part of the variation in utilization of antenatal care.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:455 / 462
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neuroticism is associated with higher antenatal care utilization in obstetric low-risk women
    Axfors, Cathrine
    Hellgren, Charlotte
    Volgsten, Helena
    Svanberg, Agneta Skoog
    Ekselius, Lisa
    Wikstrom, Anna-Karin
    Ramklint, Mia
    Skalkidou, Alkistis
    Sundstrom-Poromaa, Inger
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (04) : 470 - 478
  • [2] IS ANTENATAL CARE APPORTIONED ACCORDING TO OBSTETRIC RISK
    BEECH, BAL
    ROBINSON, J
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1994, 16 (04): : 487 - 488
  • [3] IS ANTENATAL CARE APPORTIONED ACCORDING TO OBSTETRIC RISK - THE SCOTTISH ANTENATAL CARE STUDY
    TUCKER, J
    FLOREY, JDV
    HOWIE, P
    MCILWAINE, G
    HALL, M
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1994, 16 (01): : 60 - 70
  • [4] IS ANTENATAL CARE APPORTIONED ACCORDING TO OBSTETRIC RISK - REPLY
    TUCKER, J
    FLOREY, CD
    HOWIE, P
    MCILWAINE, G
    HALL, M
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1994, 16 (04): : 488 - 489
  • [5] Socioeconomic Determinants of the Utilization of Antenatal Care and Child Vaccination in India
    Zuhair, Mohd
    Roy, Ram Babu
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 29 (08) : 649 - 659
  • [6] Obstetric and antenatal risk factors for intrauterine growth restriction
    Hromova, A. M.
    Berezhna, V. A.
    ZAPOROZHYE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 22 (03) : 395 - 401
  • [7] The factors associated with antenatal care utilization in Ethiopia
    Yemane, Getahun Dejene
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 79
  • [8] Antenatal Antecedents and the Impact of Obstetric Care in the Etiology of Cerebral Palsy
    Clark, Shannon M.
    Ghulmiyyah, Labib M.
    Hankins, Gary D. V.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 51 (04): : 775 - 786
  • [9] ANTENATAL CARE OF LOW-RISK OBSTETRIC PATIENTS BY MIDWIVES
    GUDGEON, CW
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1992, 157 (08) : 575 - 575
  • [10] Factors associated with utilization of antenatal care services in Cambodia
    Prusty R.K.
    Buoy S.
    Kumar P.
    Pradhan M.R.
    Journal of Public Health, 2015, 23 (5) : 297 - 310