Leveraging Shannon Entropy to Validate the Transition between ICD-10 and ICD-11

被引:2
|
作者
Chen, Donghua [1 ]
Zhang, Runtong [1 ]
Zhu, Xiaomin [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Mech Elect & Control Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ICD-11; ICD-10; Shannon entropy; validation; transition; SNOMED CT; QUALITY; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.3390/e20100769
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
This study aimed to propose a mapping framework with entropy-based metrics for validating the effectiveness of the transition between International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10)-coded datasets and a new context of ICD-11. Firstly, we used tabular lists and mapping tables of ICD-11 to establish the framework. Then, we leveraged Shannon entropy to propose validation methods to evaluate information changes during the transition from the perspectives of single-code, single-disease, and multiple-disease datasets. Novel metrics, namely, standardizing rate (SR), uncertainty rate (UR), and information gain (IG), were proposed for the validation. Finally, validation results from an ICD-10-coded dataset with 377,589 records indicated that the proposed metrics reduced the complexity of transition evaluation. The results with the SR in the transition indicated that approximately 60% of the ICD-10 codes in the dataset were unable to map the codes to standard ICD-10 codes released by WHO. The validation results with the UR provided 86.21% of the precise mapping. Validation results of the IG in the dataset, before and after the transition, indicated that approximately 57% of the records tended to increase uncertainty when mapped from ICD-10 to ICD-11. The new features of ICD-11 involved in the transition can promote a reliable and effective mapping between two coding systems.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anxiety disorders - from ICD-10 to ICD-11
    Vloet, Timo D.
    Romanos, Marcel
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KINDER-UND JUGENDPSYCHIATRIE UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 2021, 49 (06): : 429 - 435
  • [2] Traumatic experiences, ICD-11 PTSD, ICD-11 complex PTSD, and the overlap with ICD-10 diagnoses
    Moller, L.
    Augsburger, M.
    Elklit, A.
    Sogaard, U.
    Simonsen, E.
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 141 (05) : 421 - 431
  • [3] Dimensionality of ICD-10 and ICD-11 criteria and related symptoms
    Preuss, U. W.
    Wurst, F. M.
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 46 : 83 - 83
  • [4] ICD-10与ICD-11的异同分析
    贾增丽
    [J]. 江苏卫生事业管理, 2020, 31 (05) : 597 - 599
  • [5] Comparison of the accuracy of inpatient morbidity coding with ICD-11 and ICD-10
    Zarei, Javad
    Golpira, Reza
    Hashemi, Nasim
    Azadmanjir, Zahra
    Meidani, Zahra
    Vahedi, Akram
    Bakhshandeh, Hooman
    Fakharian, Esmaeil
    Sheikhtaheri, Abbas
    [J]. HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023,
  • [6] Schizophrenia in ICD-11: Comparison of ICD-10 and DSM-5
    Valle, Ruben
    [J]. REVISTA DE PSIQUIATRIA Y SALUD MENTAL, 2020, 13 (02): : 95 - 104
  • [7] Coding rules for uncertain and "ruled out" diagnoses in ICD-10 and ICD-11
    Atolagbe, Oluseun O.
    Romano, Patrick S.
    Southern, Danielle A.
    Wongtanasarasin, Wachira
    Ghali, William A.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2024, 21 (SUPPL 6)
  • [8] 糖尿病ICD-10与ICD-11编码比较
    桂强
    刘辰雨
    孟洁
    [J]. 中国病案, 2022, (06) : 49 - 52
  • [9] Changes from ICD-10 to ICD-11 and future directions in psychiatric classification
    Gaebel, Wolfgang
    Stricker, Johannes
    Kerst, Ariane
    [J]. DIALOGUES IN CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 22 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [10] From ICD-10 to ICD-11 and people with disorders of intellectual development (PWDID)
    Cooray, S.
    Alexander, R.
    Roy, A.
    Purandre, K.
    Devapriam, J.
    Wijeratne, A.
    Kwok, H.
    Mendis, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 27 (04) : 327 - 327