Implant volume estimation in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy

被引:8
|
作者
Shia, Wei-Chung [1 ]
Yang, Hui-Ju [2 ]
Wu, Hwa-Koon [3 ]
Lin, Shih-Lung [4 ]
Lai, Hung-Wen [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Huang, Yu-Len [8 ]
Chen, Dar-Ren [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Changhua Christian Hosp, Canc Res Ctr, Changhua, Taiwan
[2] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Changhua, Taiwan
[3] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Changhua, Taiwan
[4] Changhua Christian Hosp, Dept Reconstruct Plast & Hand Surg, Changhua, Taiwan
[5] Changhua Christian Hosp, Endoscop & Oncoplast Breast Surg Ctr, Changhua, Taiwan
[6] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Changhua Christian Hosp, Comprehens Breast Canc Ctr, 135 NanXiao St, Changhua 500, Taiwan
[8] Tunghai Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Nipple-sparing mastectomy; Breast reconstruction; Direct-to-implant reconstruction;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.024
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is an increasingly popular alternative to more traditional mastectomy approaches. However, estimating the implant volume during direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction following NSM is difficult for surgeons with little-to-moderate experience. We aimed to provide a fast, easy to use, and accurate method to aid in the estimation of implant size for DTI reconstruction using the specimen weight and breast volume. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using data from 145 NSM patients with specific implant types. Standard two-dimensional digital mammograms were obtained in 118 of the patients. Breastmorphological factors (specimen weight, mammographic breast density and volume, and implant size and type) were recorded. Curve-fitting and linear regression models were used to develop formulas predicting the implant volume, and the prediction performance of the obtained formulas was evaluated using the prospective data set. Results: Two formulas to estimate the implant size were obtained, one using the specimen weight and one using the breast volume. The coefficients of correlation (R-2) in these formulas were over 0.98 and the root mean squared errors were approximately 13. Conclusions: These implant volume estimate formulas benefit surgeons by providing a preoperative implant volume assessment in DTI reconstruction using the breast volume and an intraoperative assessment using the specimen weight. The implant size estimation formulas obtained in the present study may be applied in a majority of patients. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 296
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Colwell, Amy S.
    Christensen, Joani M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (05) : 44S - 50S
  • [2] Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Sagir, Mehmet
    Guven, Erdem
    Eroz, Seda
    Uras, Cihan
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (19) : E33758
  • [3] Reply: How to Preshape the Breast for a Successful Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction in the Challenging Breast
    Gunnarsson, Gudjon L.
    Thomsen, Jorn Bo
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 141 (04) : 610E - 611E
  • [4] Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing and Skin-Sparing Mastectomy in Breast-Augmented Patients: Prepectoral or Submuscular Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction?
    Salgarello, Marzia
    Fabbri, Mariachiara
    Visconti, Giuseppe
    Adesi, Liliana Barone
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2024, 44 (05) : 503 - 515
  • [5] Endoscopic-assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy with Direct-to-Implant Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in the Management of Breast Cancer
    Zhang, Songbo
    Xie, Yanyan
    Liang, Faqing
    Wang, Yao
    Lv, Qing
    Du, Zhenggui
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (12)
  • [6] Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction without Placement of Acellular Dermal Matrix or Mesh after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Urban, Cicero
    Gonzalez, Eduardo
    Fornazari, Alessandra
    Berman, Gaston
    Spautz, Cleverton
    Kuroda, Flavia
    Anselmi, Karina Furlan
    Rabinovich, Iris
    Doria, Maira
    Nissen, Leonardo
    Schunemann, Eduardo, Jr.
    Sobreiro, Bernardo
    Lima, Rubens
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 150 (05) : 973 - 983
  • [7] Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction of the Large and Ptotic Breast: Is Preshaping of the Challenging Breast a Key to Success?
    Gunnarsson, Gudjon L.
    Bille, Camilla
    Reitsma, Laurens C.
    Wamberg, Peter
    Thomsen, Jorn Bo
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (03) : 449 - 454
  • [8] Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction of the Large and Ptotic Breast: Is Preshaping of the Challenging Breast a Key to Success?
    Li, Shangshan
    Luan, Jie
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 141 (04) : 609E - 609E
  • [9] Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander–implant reconstruction
    Hiroki Mori
    Noriko Uemura
    Mutsumi Okazaki
    Tsuyoshi Nakagawa
    Takanobu Sato
    Breast Cancer, 2016, 23 : 740 - 744
  • [10] Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction of the Large and Ptotic Breast: Is Preshaping of the Challenging Breast a Key to Success?
    Bonomi, Stefano
    Sala, Laura
    Cortinovis, Umberto
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 141 (06) : 959E - 960E