Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Safety Outcome Endpoints and Delineation of Risk Factors

被引:67
|
作者
Nealon, Kassandra P.
Weitzman, Rachel E.
Sobti, Nikhil
Gadd, Michele
Specht, Michelle
Jimenez, Rachel B.
Ehrlichman, Richard
Faulkner, Heather R.
Austen, William G., Jr.
Liao, Eric C.
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; ANIMATION DEFORMITY; COMPLICATIONS; MASTECTOMY; EVOLUTION; POCKET; PAIN; MESH;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000006721
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Continued evolution of implant-based breast reconstruction involves immediate placement of the implant above the pectoralis muscle. The shift to prepectoral breast reconstruction is driven by goals of decreasing morbidity such as breast animation deformity, range-of-motion problems, and pain, and is made possible by improvements in mastectomy skin flap viability. To define clinical factors to guide patient selection for direct-to-implant prepectoral implant reconstruction, this study compares safety endpoints and risk factors between prepectoral and subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction cohorts. The authors hypothesized that prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction is a safe alternative to subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Methods: Retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent prepectoral and subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction, performed by a team of five surgical oncologists and two plastic surgeons. Univariate analysis compared patient characteristics between cohorts. A penalized logistic regression model was constructed to identify relationships between postoperative complications and covariate risk factors. Results: A cohort of 114 prepectoral direct-to-implant patients was compared with 142 subpectoral direct-to-implant patients. The results of the penalized regression model demonstrated equivalence in safety metrics between prepectoral direct-to-implant and subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction, including seroma (p = 0.0883), cancer recurrence (p = 0.876), explantation (p = 0.992), capsular contracture (p = 0.158), mastectomy skin flap necrosis (p = 0.769), infection (p = 0.523), hematoma (p = 0.228), and revision (p = 0.122). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that prepectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction is a safe alternative to subpectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction. Given the low morbidity and elimination of animation deformity, prepectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction should be considered when the mastectomy skin flap is robust.
引用
收藏
页码:E898 / E908
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reply: Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Safety Outcome Endpoints and Delineation of Risk Factors
    Sobti, Nikhil
    Rosado, Nikki
    Nealon, Kassandra
    Specht, Michelle
    Liao, Eric C.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (01) : 162E - 163E
  • [2] Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
    Safran, Tyler
    Al-Badarin, Faris
    Al-Halabi, Becher
    Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
    Dionisopoulos, Tassos
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 150 (01) : 22E - 31E
  • [3] Associated Factors and Prevention of Upper Pole Rippling in Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Ryu, Da Hye
    Joo, Oh Young
    Roh, Yun Ho
    Yang, Eun Jung
    Song, Seung Yong
    Lee, Dong Won
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2023, 50 (06): : 541 - 549
  • [4] Prepectoral Direct-To-Implant One-Stage Reconstruction With ADMs: Safety and Outcome in "Thin Patients"
    Scarabosio, Anna
    Negrini, Filippo Contessi
    Pisano, Gaetano
    Beorchia, Yvonne
    Castriotta, Luigi
    De Francesco, Francesco
    Riccio, Michele
    Parodi, Pier Camillo
    Zingaretti, Nicola
    [J]. CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2023, 23 (08) : E507 - E514
  • [5] An Algorithmic Approach to Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Version 2.0
    Antony, Anuja K.
    Robinson, Emilie C.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (05) : 1311 - 1319
  • [6] Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Safran, Tyler
    Al-Halabi, Becher
    Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
    Hazan, Jessica
    Dionisopoulos, Tassos
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (06) : 882E - 890E
  • [7] Prepectoral Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Anterior AlloDerm Coverage
    Jones, Glyn
    Yoo, Aran
    King, Victor
    Jao, Brian
    Wang, Huaping
    Rammos, Charalambos
    Elwood, Eric
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (06) : 31S - 38S
  • [8] The Utility of a Lateral Adipodermal Flap in Prepectoral Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction
    Schwartz, Jean-Claude D.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (03) : E4881
  • [9] Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction
    Safran, Tyler
    Dionisopoulos, Tassos
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (02) : 332E - 334E
  • [10] Prepectoral Hammock and Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction in 10 Minutes: A Focus on Technique
    Gunnarsson, Gudjon L.
    Thomsen, Jorn Bo
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (10)