Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization with Variable Relocation for Dynamic Optimization Problems

被引:0
|
作者
Zhan, Zhi-Hui [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Li, Jing-Jing [5 ]
Zhang, Jun [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Key Lab Machine Intelligence & Adv Comp, Minist Educ, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Engn Res Ctr Supercomp Engn Software, Minist Educ, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Educ Dept Guangdong Prov, Key Lab Software Technol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] S China Normal Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS; EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION; ENVIRONMENTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper proposes to solve the dynamic optimization problem (DOP) by using an adaptive particle swarm optimization (APSO) algorithm with an variable relocation strategy (VRS). The VRS based APSO algorithm (APSO/VRS) has the following two advantages when solving DOP. Firstly, by using the APSO optimizing framework, the algorithm benefits from the fast optimization speed due to the adaptive parameter control. More importantly, the adaptive parameter and operator in APSO make the algorithm fast respond to the environment changes of DOP. Secondly, VRS was reported in the literature to help dynamic evolutionary algorithm (DEA) to relocate the individual position in promising region when environment changes. Therefore, the modified VRS used in APSO can collect historical information in the stability stage and use such information to guide the particle variable relocation in the change stage. We evaluated both APSO and APSO/VRS on several dynamic benchmark problems and compared with two state-of-the-art DEAs and DEA that also used the VRS. The results show that both APSO and APSO/VRS can obtain very competitive results on these problems, and APSO/VRS outperforms others on most of the test cases.
引用
收藏
页码:1565 / 1570
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Orthogonal Learning Particle Swarm Optimization with Variable Relocation for Dynamic Optimization
    Wang, Zi-Jia
    Zhan, Zhi-Hui
    Du, Ke-Jing
    Yu, Zhi-Wen
    Zhang, Jun
    [J]. 2016 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2016, : 594 - 600
  • [2] An adaptive parallel particle swarm optimization for numerical optimization problems
    Xinsheng Lai
    Yuren Zhou
    [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2019, 31 : 6449 - 6467
  • [3] An adaptive parallel particle swarm optimization for numerical optimization problems
    Lai, Xinsheng
    Zhou, Yuren
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2019, 31 (10): : 6449 - 6467
  • [4] A particle swarm optimization algorithm for mixed-variable optimization problems
    Wang, Feng
    Zhang, Heng
    Zhou, Aimin
    [J]. SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2021, 60
  • [5] Particle swarm optimization for problems with variable number of dimensions
    Kadlec, Petr
    Sedenka, Vladimir
    [J]. ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2018, 50 (03) : 382 - 399
  • [6] A dynamic adaptive particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for different constrained engineering design optimization problems
    Zhu, Hao
    Hu, Yumei
    Zhu, Weidong
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 11 (03)
  • [7] Dynamic-objective particle swarm optimization for constrained optimization problems
    Lu, Haiyan
    Chen, Weiqi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION, 2006, 12 (04) : 408 - 418
  • [8] A particle swarm optimization based memetic algorithm for dynamic optimization problems
    Wang, Hongfeng
    Yang, Shengxiang
    Ip, W. H.
    Wang, Dingwei
    [J]. NATURAL COMPUTING, 2010, 9 (03) : 703 - 725
  • [9] A particle swarm optimization based memetic algorithm for dynamic optimization problems
    Hongfeng Wang
    Shengxiang Yang
    W. H. Ip
    Dingwei Wang
    [J]. Natural Computing, 2010, 9 : 703 - 725
  • [10] Dynamic-objective particle swarm optimization for constrained optimization problems
    Haiyan Lu
    Weiqi Chen
    [J]. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 2006, 12 : 409 - 419