Decision support tools for agriculture: Towards effective design and delivery

被引:297
|
作者
Rose, David C. [1 ]
Sutherland, William J. [1 ]
Parker, Caroline [2 ]
Lobley, Matt [3 ]
Winter, Michael [3 ]
Morris, Carol [4 ]
Twining, Susan [5 ]
Ffoulkes, Charles [5 ]
Amano, Tatsuya [1 ]
Dicks, Lynn V. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, David Attenborough Bldg,Pembroke St, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, England
[2] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Cowcaddens Rd, Glasgow G4 0BA, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Exeter, Coll Social Sci & Int Studies, Land Environm Policy & Econ Inst, Prince Wales Rd, Exeter EX4 4PJ, Devon, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Fac Social Sci, Sch Geog, Sir Clive Granger Bldg,Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[5] ADAS UK Ltd, Pendeford House,Pendeford Business Pk,Wobaston Rd, Wolverhampton WV9 5AP, W Midlands, England
[6] Univ East Anglia, Biol Sci, Norwich NR4 7TL, Norfolk, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Decision support tools; Decision support systems; Evidence-based decision-making; Human-computer interactions; sustainable intensification; UNIFIED THEORY; SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; FARMERS; ACCEPTANCE; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.009
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Decision support tools, usually considered to be software-based, may be an important part of the quest for evidence-based decision-making in agriculture to improve productivity and environmental outputs. These tools can lead users through clear steps and suggest optimal decision paths or may act more as information sources to improve the evidence base for decisions. Yet, despite their availability in a wide range of formats, studies in several countries have shown uptake to be disappointingly low. This paper uses a mixed methods approach to investigate the factors affecting the uptake and use of decision support tools by farmers and advisers in the UK Through a combination of qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys, we found that fifteen factors are influential in convincing farmers and advisers to use decision support tools, which include usability, cost-effectiveness, performance, relevance to user, and compatibility with compliance demands. This study finds a plethora of agricultural decision support tools in operation in the UK, yet, like other studies, shows that their uptake is low. A better understanding of the fifteen factors identified should lead to more effective design and delivery of tools in the future. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 174
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Towards Decision Support Model for Ubiquitous Agriculture
    Haider, Waleej
    Aqeel-ur-Rehman
    Durrani, Nouman M.
    [J]. 2013 EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (ICDIM), 2013, : 308 - 313
  • [2] TOWARDS LIFE-CYCLE AWARENESS IN DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN
    Nergard, Henrik
    Sandberg, Marcus
    Larsson, Tobias
    [J]. ICED 09 - THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, VOL 6: DESIGN METHODS AND TOOLS, PT 2, 2009, : 23 - +
  • [3] Effective Decision Support System Based on Statistical Tools
    Pribyl, Pavel
    Pribyl, Ondrej
    [J]. CHALLENGE OF TRANSPORT TELEMATICS, TST 2016, 2016, 640 : 378 - 387
  • [4] Decision support tools for process design and selection
    Kheawhom, S
    Hirao, M
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 26 (4-5) : 747 - 755
  • [5] On validating engineering design decision support tools
    Olewnik, AT
    Lewis, K
    [J]. CONCURRENT ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2005, 13 (02): : 111 - 122
  • [6] Decision support tools for clinical trial design
    Modgil, S
    Hammond, P
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 27 (02) : 181 - 200
  • [7] Design and implementation of the spatial decision support system for agriculture
    Yan, Xiaojun
    Wang, Weirui
    Liang, Jianping
    [J]. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 26 (09): : 257 - 262
  • [9] Assessing tools relevance for energy simulation at the urban scale: towards decision-support tools for urban design and densification
    Ribault, Clement
    Bouquerel, Mathias
    Bruna, Adrien
    Schumann, Mathieu
    Rusaouen, Gilles
    Wurtz, Etienne
    [J]. CISBAT 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FUTURE BUILDINGS & DISTRICTS - ENERGY EFFICIENCY FROM NANO TO URBAN SCALE, 2017, 122 : 871 - 876
  • [10] Insights for developing effective decision support tools for environmental sustainability
    Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle
    Mach, Katharine J.
    Jagannathan, Kripa
    Sjostrom, Kathryn Dana
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 42 : 52 - 59