Comparison of data with Monte Carlo simulations at the ATLAS barrel Combined Testbeam 2004

被引:3
|
作者
Speckmayer, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/160/1/012076
中图分类号
O412 [相对论、场论]; O572.2 [粒子物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
The scheme adopted as baseline by ATLAS for the calibration of hadrons depends strongly on the quality of the description of the data by simulations. In 2004, the calorimeters of the ATLAS barrel region have been exposed to a testbeam in order to evaluate the energy response of pions for the energies ranging from 1 to 350 GeV. For the energy region from 3 to 9 GeV a data analysis with the full systematic uncertainty is available. The data has been compared extensively to GEANT4 simulations. Several combinations of physical models-the so called "physics lists"-are provided by the GEANT4 collaboration and have been evaluated. The best overall description of data is achieved with the physics list QGSP_BERT which describes the energy response of pions within a few percent. QGSP_BERT has been adopted by ATLAS for the simulation of the first data.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Semiconductor Tracker performance in the ATLAS Combined Testbeam 2004
    Gonzales-Sevilla, S.
    Costa, M. J.
    Garcia, S. Marti
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS B-PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 172 : 64 - 66
  • [2] Combined Studies of the EM Calorimeter and the Inner Detector in the 2004 ATLAS Combined Testbeam
    Froeschl, Robert
    ASTROPARTICLE, PARTICLE AND SPACE PHYSICS, DETECTORS AND MEDICAL PHYSICS APPLICATIONS, 2010, 5 : 342 - 346
  • [3] Comparison of GEANT4 simulations with testbeam data and GEANT3 for the ATLAS liquid argon calorimeter
    Benchekroun, D
    Karapetian, G
    Mazini, R
    Kiryunin, A
    Salihagic, D
    Kish, J
    Strizenec, P
    Kordas, K
    Parrour, G
    Leltchouk, M
    Negroni, S
    Seligman, W
    Simion, S
    Loch, P
    Soukharev, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF CHEP 2001, 2001, : 350 - 353
  • [4] The ATLAS Trigger and Data Acquisition System during the 2002 combined testbeam run
    Lehmann, G
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS B-PROCEEDINGS SUPPLEMENTS, 2003, 125 : 288 - 292
  • [5] Dosimetric comparison of MapCheck with Monte Carlo simulations
    Luo, W.
    Yin, F.
    Ma, C.
    Fan, J.
    Song, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2440 - 2440
  • [6] Comparison of analytical theory with Monte Carlo simulations
    Jansen, G.H.
    Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, 2024, 230 : 437 - 454
  • [7] A new PET prototype for proton therapy: comparison of data and Monte Carlo simulations
    Rosso, V.
    Battistoni, G.
    Belcari, N.
    Camarlinghi, N.
    Ferrari, A.
    Ferretti, S.
    Kraan, A.
    Mairani, A.
    Marino, N.
    Ortuno, J. E.
    Pullia, M.
    Sala, P.
    Santos, A.
    Sportelli, G.
    Straub, K.
    Del Guerra, A.
    JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2013, 8
  • [8] ATLAS Monte Carlo generator tunes to LHC data
    Buckley, Andy
    2010 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD (NSS/MIC), 2010, : 167 - 173
  • [9] Data analysis for quantum Monte Carlo simulations
    Neuber, DR
    Fischer, RO
    von der Linden, W
    BAYESIAN INFERENCE AND MAXIMUM ENTROPY METHODS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2004, 735 : 245 - 251
  • [10] Monte Carlo Simulations of Wind Speed Data
    Gallagher, Ron
    Elmore, Andrew Curtis
    WIND ENGINEERING, 2009, 33 (06) : 661 - 673