Clinical outcome measures in SPMS trials: An analysis of the IMPACT and ASCEND original trial data sets

被引:23
|
作者
Koch, Marcus W. [1 ,2 ]
Mostert, Jop [3 ]
Uitdehaag, Bernard [4 ]
Cutter, Gary [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Clin Neurosci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Rijnstate Hosp, Dept Neurol, Arnhem, Netherlands
[4] Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, MS Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Biostat, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
Clinical trial; outcome measurement; progressive; TIMED 25-FOOT WALK; DISABILITY STATUS SCALE; 9-HOLE PEG TEST; PROGRESSIVE MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; FUNCTIONAL COMPOSITE; NATURAL-HISTORY; MS; SYSTEMS; SPEED;
D O I
10.1177/1352458519876701
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Still too little is known about the natural history of clinical outcome measures beyond the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), such as the timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) and nine-hole peg test (9HPT) in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Objective: To describe progression on the EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT, and their combinations. To investigate the association of the baseline characteristics age, sex, EDSS, T25FW, gadolinium-enhancing lesions, and relapse activity with EDSS and T25FW progression. Methods: Using original trial data from the placebo arms of the IMPACT and ASCEND randomized controlled trials, we describe disability progression (with and without 3- or 6-month confirmation). We investigated the association of selected baseline characteristics with EDSS and T25FW progression over 2 years using binary logistic regression. Results: T25FW was the single outcome measure with the largest proportion of patients progressing, followed by EDSS and 9HPT. EDSS and T25FW at baseline were associated with EDSS and T25FW progression in both data sets. Age and relapse activity were only mild and inconsistent predictors, while sex and gadolinium enhancement at baseline did not predict disability progression in either data set. Conclusion: Our analyses inform the selection of primary outcome measures as well as inclusion criteria for clinical trials in SPMS.
引用
收藏
页码:1540 / 1549
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating clinical trial data: Outcome measures
    Conley, RR
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 62 : 23 - 28
  • [2] Editorial: Core outcome sets and measures for clinical trials in implant dentistry
    Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa
    Papapanou, Panos N. N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2023, 50 : 4 - 4
  • [3] Editorial: Core outcome sets and measures for clinical trials in implant dentistry
    Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa
    Papapanou, Panos N.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 : 3 - 3
  • [5] Outcome measures in clinical trials
    Heyse, JF
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (02) : 87 - 87
  • [6] The impact of data errors on the outcome of randomized clinical trials
    Buyse, Marc
    Squifflet, Pierre
    Coart, Elisabeth
    Quinaux, Emmanuel
    Punt, Cornelis J. A.
    Saad, Everardo D.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2017, 14 (05) : 499 - 506
  • [7] Models for the analysis of repeated continuous outcome measures in clinical trials
    De Livera, Alysha M.
    Zaloumis, Sophie
    Simpson, Julie A.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2014, 19 (02) : 155 - 161
  • [8] Longitudinal data analysis (repeated measures) in clinical trials
    Albert, PS
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1999, 18 (13) : 1707 - 1732
  • [9] Are core data sets the answer for outcome measures?
    Oeffinger, Donna
    DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2017, 59 (03): : 244 - 244
  • [10] Concordance and discordance in SLE clinical trial outcome measures: analysis of three anifrolumab phase 2/3 trials
    Bruce, Ian N.
    Furie, Richard A.
    Morand, Eric F.
    Manzi, Susan
    Tanaka, Yoshiya
    Kalunian, Kenneth C.
    Merrill, Joan T.
    Puzio, Patricia
    Maho, Emmanuelle
    Kleoudis, Christi
    Albulescu, Marius
    Hultquist, Micki
    Tummala, Raj
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2022, 81 (07) : 962 - 969