Women's experiences of decision-making and attitudes in relation to induction of labour: A survey study

被引:15
|
作者
Coates, Dominiek [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Donnolley, Natasha [4 ,9 ]
Foureur, Maralyn [5 ,8 ,10 ,11 ]
Henry, Amanda [3 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, Ctr Midwifery & Child & Family Hlth, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
[2] Maridulu Budyari Gumal, Sydney Partnership Hlth Educ Res & Enterprise SPH, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] UNSW, UNSW Med, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] UNSW, Ctr Big Data Res Hlth, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol & Stat Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Newcastle, Fac Hlth & Med, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[6] St George Hosp, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] UNSW Med, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] Hunter New England Nursing & Midwifery Res Ctr, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[9] UNSW, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol & Stat Unit, Ctr Big Data Res Hlth CBDRH, Level 4,Lowy Bldg C25,Cnr Bot & High St Enter Via, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[10] HNE Nursing & Midwifery Res Ctr, James Fletcher Campus,72 Watt St, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
[11] Univ Newcastle, James Fletcher Campus,72 Watt St, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Induction of labour; Women's experiences; Shared decision-making; Mode of birth preferences; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; CARE; PERCEPTIONS; INFORMATION; PREGNANCY; TERM; AIDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.wombi.2020.02.020
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Rates of induction of labour have been increasing globally to up to one in three pregnancies in many high-income countries. Although guidelines around induction, and strength of the underlying evidence, vary considerably by indication, shared decision-making is increasingly recognised as key. The aim of this study was to identify women's mode of birth preferences and experiences of shared decision-making for induction of labour. Method: An antenatal survey of women booked for an induction at eight Sydney hospitals was conducted. A bespoke questionnaire was created assessing women's demographics, indication for induction, pregnancy model of care, initial birth preferences, and their experience of the decision-making process. Results: Of 189 survey respondents (58% nulliparous), major reported reasons for induction included prolonged pregnancy (38%), diabetes (25%), and suspected fetal growth restriction (8%). Most respondents (72%) had hoped to labour spontaneously. Major findings included 19% of women not feeling like they had a choice about induction of labour, 26% not feeling adequately informed (or uncertain if informed), 17% not being given alternatives, and 30% not receiving any written information on induction of labour. Qualitative responses highlight a desire of women to be more actively involved in decision-making. Conclusion: A substantial minority of women did not feel adequately informed or prepared, and indicated they were not given alternatives to induction. Suggested improvements include for face-to-face discussions to be supplemented with written information, and for shared decision-making interventions, such as the introduction of decision aids and training, to be implemented and evaluated. (C) 2020 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E170 / E177
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Induction of labour: Experiences of care and decision-making of women and clinicians
    Coates, Dominiek
    Goodfellow, Alison
    Sinclair, Lynn
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2020, 33 (01) : E1 - E14
  • [2] The experiences of shared decision-making of women who had an induction of labour
    Coates, Dominiek
    Thirukumar, Purshaiyna
    Henry, Amanda
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (03) : 489 - 495
  • [3] Women's experiences of decision-making and beliefs in relation to planned caesarean section: A survey study
    Coates, Dominiek
    Donnolley, Natasha
    Thirukumar, Purshaiyna
    Lainchbury, Anne
    Spear, Virginia
    Henry, Amanda
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 61 (01): : 106 - 115
  • [4] Practice variation in induction of labour: women’s role in the decision-making process
    Anne E. M. Brabers
    Tamar M. Van Haaren–Ten Haken
    Judit K. J. Keulen
    Pien M. Offerhaus
    Marianne J. Nieuwenhuijze
    Judith D. de Jong
    Research in Health Services & Regions, 4 (1):
  • [5] Women's Experiences and Involvement in Decision-Making in Relation to Planned Cesarean Birth: An Interview Study
    Thirukumar, Purshaiyna
    Henry, Amanda
    Coates, Dominiek
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL EDUCATION, 2021, 30 (04): : 213 - 222
  • [6] Women's hysterectomy experiences and decision-making
    Uskul, AK
    Ahmad, F
    Leyland, NA
    Stewart, DE
    WOMEN & HEALTH, 2003, 38 (01) : 53 - 67
  • [7] Women's information needs, decision-making and experiences of membrane sweeping to promote spontaneous labour
    Roberts, Julie
    Evans, Kerry
    Spiby, Helen
    Evans, Catrin
    Pallotti, Phoebe
    Eldridge, Jeanette
    MIDWIFERY, 2020, 83
  • [8] Variation in clinical decision-making for induction of labour: a qualitative study
    Nippita, Tanya A.
    Porter, Maree
    Seeho, Sean K.
    Morris, Jonathan M.
    Roberts, Christine L.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17
  • [9] Variation in clinical decision-making for induction of labour: a qualitative study
    Tanya A. Nippita
    Maree Porter
    Sean K. Seeho
    Jonathan M. Morris
    Christine L. Roberts
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17
  • [10] Maternity healthcare professionals' experiences of supporting women in decision-making for labour and birth: a qualitative study
    Hardman, Kitty
    Davies, Anna
    Demetri, Andrew
    Clayton, Gemma
    Bakhbakhi, Danya
    Birchenall, Katherine
    Barnfield, Sonia
    Fraser, Abigail
    Burden, Christy
    Mcguinness, Sheelagh
    Miller, Rachel
    Merriel, Abi
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (04):