New treatment strategy for endometriosis using progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with dienogest: A prospective cohort study, comparison of dienogest versus dydrogesterone

被引:13
|
作者
Iwami, Nanako [1 ]
Kawamata, Miho [1 ]
Ozawa, Naoko [1 ]
Yamamoto, Takahiro [1 ]
Watanabe, Eri [1 ]
Mizuuchi, Masahito [1 ]
Moriwaka, Osamu [1 ]
Kamiya, Hirobumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kamiya Ladies Clin, Chuo Ku, 2-1,Nishi 2,Kita 3, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600003, Japan
关键词
Progestin primed ovarian stimulation; Dienogest; Dydrogesterone; Endometriosis; Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; THERAPY; AGONIST; WOMEN; EXPRESSION; OVULATION; SURGERY; ACETATE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.repbio.2020.100470
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Dienogest (DNG) is an oral progestin effective for the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis, such as reduction of endometrial lesion and control of pain intensity. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is a new controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimen, and several reports have shown that dydrogesterone (DYG) is an appropriate progestin for PPOS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of DNG in patients undergoing PPOS during COH in comparison with DYG. This was a prospective, cohort, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial of 150 women with endometriosis undergoing assisted reproductive technology between February 2018 and May 2020 at the single fertility center. The assignment to each protocol was based on the optimal treatment for each patient. Patients taking DNG 2 mg continuously were assigned in the DNG group(n = 73). The other patients were allocated in DYG group (n = 77). All viable embryos were cryopreserved for subsequent transfer. The main outcome measures were the mature oocyte and fertilization rates. During this study, no premature LH surge was detected. A smaller number of oocytes were retrieved in the DNG group than in the DYG group (6.18 +/- 3.60 vs. 9.85 +/- 5.77); however, the rate of mature oocytes was significantly higher in the DNG group than in the DYG group (89.1 % vs. 78.9 %). The fertilization rate was comparable between two groups. Therefore, patients taking DNG for PPOS can continue endometriosis treatment and obtain good-quality embryos during COH. Further prospective randomized-controlled trial should be performed to confirm of this novel strategy of DNG. (C) 2020 Society for Biology of Reproduction & the Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of Polish Academy of Sciences in Olsztyn. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Dienogest is effective for a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for in vitro fertilization while continuing the treatment of endometriosis
    Iwami, N.
    Mizuuchi, M.
    Kawamata, M.
    Ozawa, N.
    Yamamoto, T.
    Watanabe, E.
    Moriwaka, O.
    Kamiya, H.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 : 277 - 278
  • [2] Neonatal outcomes of the first 65 infants delivered after IVF treatment with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation using dienogest in patients with endometriosis
    Iwami, N.
    Kawamata, M.
    Ozawa, N.
    Yamamoto, T.
    Watanabe, E.
    Mizuuchi, M.
    Moriwaka, O.
    Kamiya, H.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 484 - 485
  • [3] Comparison of Dydrogesterone and Medroxyprogesterone in the Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol for Patients With Poor Ovarian Response
    Zhang, Junwei
    Du, Mingze
    Li, Zhen
    Liu, Wenxia
    Ren, Bingnan
    Zhang, Yuchao
    Guan, Yichun
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [4] Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dydrogesterone versus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome for in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Huang, Jialyu
    Xie, Qin
    Lin, Jiaying
    Lu, Xuefeng
    Zhu, Jing
    Gao, Hongyuan
    Cai, Renfei
    Kuang, Yanping
    [J]. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2019, 13 : 4461 - 4470
  • [5] New trial of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation using dydrogesterone versus a typical GnRH antagonist regimen in assisted reproductive technology
    Nanako Iwami
    Miho Kawamata
    Naoko Ozawa
    Takahiro Yamamoto
    Eri Watanabe
    Osamu Moriwaka
    Hirobumi Kamiya
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 298 : 663 - 671
  • [6] New trial of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation using dydrogesterone versus a typical GnRH antagonist regimen in assisted reproductive technology
    Iwami, Nanako
    Kawamata, Miho
    Ozawa, Naoko
    Yamamoto, Takahiro
    Watanabe, Eri
    Moriwaka, Osamu
    Kamiya, Hirobumi
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 298 (03) : 663 - 671
  • [7] Outcomes of fertility preservation in women with endometriosis: comparison of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus antagonist protocols
    d'Argent, Emmanuelle Mathieu
    Ferrier, Clement
    Zacharopoulou, Chrysoula
    Ahdad-Yata, Naouel
    Boudy, Anne-Sophie
    Cantalloube, Adele
    Levy, Rachel
    Antoine, Jean-Marie
    Darai, Emile
    Bendifallah, Sofiane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2020, 13 (01)
  • [8] Outcomes of fertility preservation in women with endometriosis: comparison of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus antagonist protocols
    Emmanuelle Mathieu d’Argent
    Clément Ferrier
    Chrysoula Zacharopoulou
    Naouel Ahdad-Yata
    Anne-Sophie Boudy
    Adèle Cantalloube
    Rachel Levy
    Jean-Marie Antoine
    Emile Daraï
    Sofiane Bendifallah
    [J]. Journal of Ovarian Research, 13
  • [9] The new strategy of dydrogesterone protocol as progestin primed ovarian stimulation is effective for patients with ovarian endometriosis undergoing in vitro fertilization
    Iwami, N.
    Kamiya, H.
    HIrayama, N.
    Kobayashi, Y.
    Kawamata, M.
    Ozawa, N.
    Yamamoto, T.
    Watanabe, E.
    Moriwaka, O.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 : 255 - 256
  • [10] Comparison of reproductive outcomes after progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with dydrogesterone versus cetrorelix to inhibit spontaneous ovulation in oocyte donation
    Moreno, J. A.
    Masoli, P.
    Sferrazza, C.
    Leiva, H.
    Espinosa, O.
    Hernande Rudnick, P.
    Lizardo, J.
    Rivera, F.
    Plaz de los Reyes, S.
    Cordova, M.
    Sferrazza, E.
    Chavez, N.
    Sepulveda, M.
    Jiliberto, B.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 458 - 459