Business process performance measurement under conditions of business practice

被引:5
|
作者
Zamecnik, Roman [1 ]
Rajnoha, Rastislav [1 ]
机构
[1] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Nam TG Masaryka 5555, Zlin 76001, Czech Republic
关键词
Business process management; controlling; performance management; performance measurement; MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; ENTERPRISES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00833-3
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The paper focuses on the presentation of selected research results related to business process performance measurement carried out in Czech and Slovak enterprises during the period of 2007-2014. There is an emphasis on intermingling and seeking out of mutual associations between theoretical presumptions, previously resolved projects, and realistic observations based on the outcomes of the research conducted and the methodology used. The theoretical part of the paper provides a detailed characterisation of the current state of affairs regarding the investigated performance measurement issue. The following part of the paper defines the basic research methodology and expected contributions of the study. The aim of the paper is also to analyse and synthesize findings regarding the chosen, mainly not traditional methods and models, which have started to be used for business process performance measurement in managerial practice recently. Alternatively, some of them are only been thought of being used in practice in the future. In the final part of the paper, results of the survey are introduced and confronted with those arising from professional studies carried out especially in Germany, Austria and the U.S.A. The results and outcomes of our research studies have confirmed the old saying "What cannot be measured cannot be managed". (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 749
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RESEARCH ON PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT UNDER THE CONDITIONS EXTANT IN BUSINESS PRACTICE
    Zamecnik, Roman
    Rajnoha, Rastislav
    Dobrovic, Jan
    [J]. FINANCE AND PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS IN SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND PRACTICE, 2017, : 1179 - 1192
  • [2] Business performance measurement: Theory and practice.
    Nelson, MR
    [J]. INTERFACES, 2003, 33 (04) : 86 - 87
  • [3] Business process interoperability and collaborative performance measurement
    Alfaro, J. J.
    Rodriguez-Rodriguez, R.
    Verdecho, M. J.
    Ortiz, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2009, 22 (09) : 877 - 889
  • [4] Innovation performance measurement: research into Czech business practice
    Zizlavsky, Ondrej
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2016, 29 (01): : 816 - 838
  • [5] Narrowing the Business-IT Gap in Process Performance Measurement
    van der Aa, Han
    del-Rio-Ortega, Adela
    Resinas, Manuel
    Leopold, Henrik
    Ruiz-Cortes, Antonio
    Mendling, Jan
    Reijers, Hajo A.
    [J]. ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (CAISE 2016), 2016, 9694 : 543 - 557
  • [6] Performance measurement in business process re-engineering
    Herzog, Natasa Vujica
    Polajnar, Andrej
    Pizmoht, Petja
    [J]. STROJNISKI VESTNIK-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 52 (04): : 210 - 224
  • [7] Effort Based Performance Measurement in Business Process Management
    Glykas, Michael
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE AND PROCESS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 18 (01) : 10 - 33
  • [8] Organizational Performance Measures for Business Process Management: a Performance Measurement Guideline
    Bosilj-Vuksic, Vesna
    Milanovic, Ljubica
    Skrinjar, Rok
    Indihar-Stemberger, Mojca
    [J]. 2008 UKSIM TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER MODELING AND SIMULATION, 2008, : 94 - 99
  • [9] Accountable business performance measurement for sustainable business excellence
    Kristensen, K
    Westlund, AH
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2004, 15 (5-6) : 629 - 643
  • [10] Performance measurement, business process reengineering and world class manufacturing
    Bradley, P
    Lillis, S
    OSullivan, D
    [J]. MODELLING TECHNIQUES FOR BUSINESS PROCESS RE-ENGINEERING AND BENCHMARKING, 1997, : 134 - 143