The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden

被引:47
|
作者
Born, Benjamin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dietrich, Alexander M. [3 ]
Mueller, Gernot J. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Frankfurt Sch Finance & Management, CEPR, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] CESifo, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Univ Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
[4] Univ Tubingen, CEPR, Tubingen, Germany
[5] CESifo, Tubingen, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
COSTS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0249732
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
While most countries imposed a lockdown in response to the first wave of COVID-19 infections, Sweden did not. To quantify the lockdown effect, we approximate a counterfactual lockdown scenario for Sweden through the outcome in a synthetic control unit. We find, first, that a 9-week lockdown in the first half of 2020 would have reduced infections and deaths by about 75% and 38%, respectively. Second, the lockdown effect starts to materialize with a delay of 3-4 weeks only. Third, the actual adjustment of mobility patterns in Sweden suggests there has been substantial voluntary social restraint, although the adjustment was less strong than under the lockdown scenario. Lastly, we find that a lockdown would not have caused much additional output loss.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of lockdown on students' performance: A comparative study between Italy, Sweden and Turkey
    Casalone, Giorgia
    Michelangeli, Alessandra
    Osth, John
    Turk, Umut
    [J]. HELIYON, 2023, 9 (06)
  • [2] A COUNTERFACTUAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF LOCKDOWN TIMING ON CASES OF COVID-19 ACROSS EUROPE
    Arnold, Kellyn
    Tennant, Peter
    Heppenstall, Alison
    Gilthorpe, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2021, 75 : A1 - A1
  • [3] The Counterfactual Definition of a Program Effect
    Reichardt, Charles S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2022, 43 (02) : 158 - 174
  • [4] Assessing alternative indicators for Covid-19 policy evaluation, with a counterfactual for Sweden
    Latour, Chiara
    Peracchi, Franco
    Spagnolo, Giancarlo
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (03):
  • [5] The effect of controllability and causality on counterfactual thinking
    Frosch, Caren A.
    Egan, Suzanne M.
    Hancock, Emily N.
    [J]. THINKING & REASONING, 2015, 21 (03) : 317 - 340
  • [6] Counterfactual thinking: The temporal order effect
    Clare R. Walsh
    Ruth M. J. Byrne
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2004, 32 : 369 - 378
  • [7] Counterfactual thinking and stereotypes: The nonconformity effect
    Catellani, P
    Alberici, AI
    Milesi, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 34 (04) : 421 - 436
  • [8] The Effect of Counterfactual Potency on Behavioral Intentions
    Kim, Woo J.
    Summerville, Amy
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2023, 49 (11) : 1552 - 1566
  • [9] Counterfactual thinking: The temporal order effect
    Walsh, CR
    Byrne, RMJ
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2004, 32 (03) : 369 - 378
  • [10] Comparing the responses of the UK, Sweden and Denmark to COVID-19 using counterfactual modelling
    Swapnil Mishra
    James A. Scott
    Daniel J. Laydon
    Seth Flaxman
    Axel Gandy
    Thomas A. Mellan
    H. Juliette T. Unwin
    Michaela Vollmer
    Helen Coupland
    Oliver Ratmann
    Melodie Monod
    Harrison H. Zhu
    Anne Cori
    Katy A. M. Gaythorpe
    Lilith K. Whittles
    Charles Whittaker
    Christl A. Donnelly
    Neil M. Ferguson
    Samir Bhatt
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11