Counterfactual Analysis of Runaway Earthquakes

被引:14
|
作者
Woo, Gordon [1 ]
Mignan, Arnaud [2 ]
机构
[1] RMS, 30 Monument St, London EC3R 8NB, England
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Sonneggstr 5, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT; DYNAMIC RUPTURE PROCESS; 1999; IZMIT; TURKEY; PROBABILITY; SIMULATIONS; KAIKOURA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1785/0220180138
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The historical record of earthquakes is a crucial data resource for seismic hazard analysis. In every region, the largest events are rare and difficult to parameterize. In cases for which such events are associated with the ruptures of mapped faults, defining the extent of possible fault ruptures is an important challenge that is often guided by historical precedent in which geologic, particularly paleoseismic, studies are limited. Counterfactual risk analysis recognizes that a historical event is just one realization of many possible alternatives: a fault rupture that happened in the past is just one of numerous ways in which seismic energy might have been dynamically released. Stochastic modeling of past earthquakes can provide additional insight into the complex geometry of multifault rupture. This counterfactual approach that is advocated here extends the effective time window of observation of the fault rupture process, well beyond the time span of earthquake catalogs. The basic concepts of counterfactual risk analysis are explained, followed by a seismological discussion of runaway earthquakes, illustrated in the case of the North Anatolian fault (NAF) in Turkey. This notable example demonstrates the practical utility of the counterfactual approach as a new supplementary tool for addressing one of the most difficult problems in probabilistic seismic hazard and risk assessment: selecting the multifault combinations to model as explicit seismic sources.
引用
收藏
页码:2266 / 2273
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Counterfactual Analysis of Runaway Volcanic Explosions
    Aspinall, Willy
    Woo, Gordon
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2019, 7
  • [2] Counterfactual: An R Package for Counterfactual Analysis
    Chen, Mingli
    Chernozhukov, Victor
    Fernandez-Val, Ivan
    Melly, Blaise
    [J]. R JOURNAL, 2017, 9 (01): : 370 - 384
  • [3] The Counterfactual Analysis of Cause
    I. Kvart
    [J]. Synthese, 2001, 127 : 389 - 427
  • [4] A counterfactual analysis of causation
    Ramachandran, M
    [J]. MIND, 1997, 106 (422) : 263 - 277
  • [5] The counterfactual analysis of cause
    Kvart, I
    [J]. SYNTHESE, 2001, 127 (03) : 389 - 427
  • [6] Analysis of Characters in Runaway
    陈芳芳
    [J]. 校园英语, 2016, (31) : 241 - 241
  • [7] A FACTUAL ANALYSIS OF COUNTERFACTUAL CONDITIONALS
    RESCHER, N
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 1960, 11 (04) : 49 - 54
  • [8] Generation of intermediate-depth earthquakes by self-localizing thermal runaway
    John T.
    Medvedev S.
    Rüpke L.H.
    Andersen T.B.
    Podladchikov Y.Y.
    Austrheim H.
    [J]. Nature Geoscience, 2009, 2 (2) : 137 - 140
  • [9] Counterfactual analysis of bank mergers
    Barros, Pedro P.
    Bonfim, Diana
    Kim, Moshe
    Martins, Nuno C.
    [J]. EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 46 (01) : 361 - 391
  • [10] Generation of intermediate-depth earthquakes by self-localizing thermal runaway
    John, Timm
    Medvedev, Sergei
    Ruepke, Lars H.
    Andersen, Torgeir B.
    Podladchikov, Yuri Y.
    Austrheim, Hakon
    [J]. NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2009, 2 (02) : 137 - 140