Administered versus Self-administered Online Surveys: Are the Findings Comparable?

被引:0
|
作者
Diaz de Rada, Vidal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Publ Navarra, Navarra, Spain
关键词
Methodology (Data Collection); Surveys; Acquiescence; Non response; Primacy effect; Recency effects; FACE-TO-FACE; WEB-BASED SURVEY; RESPONSE RATES; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; TELEPHONE; INTERNET; MAIL; QUESTIONNAIRES; INCENTIVES; PAPER;
D O I
10.5477/cis/reis.136.49
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This paper examines whether the results of in-person and telephone survey interviews are equivalent to those obtained via self-administered, on-line questionnaires. Of the eleven variables analyzed, five showed significantly different levels of item non-response (the highest in the on-line survey). Analysis of item-response distributions across survey formats reveals differences in all variables, although there is more response pattern similarity between in-person and telephone interviewer-administered surveys than between either of these and the self-administered format. While respondents to both interviewer-administered survey formats state their belief in the benefit to be gained from surveys and particularly in the sincerity of survey respondents, the level of approval is always higher among those interviewed in person. The on-line respondents show greater confidence in surveys, more interest in following survey-related news items and more faith in their usefulness.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 90
页数:42
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring Attentiveness in Self-Administered Surveys
    Berinsky, Adam J.
    Frydman, Alejandro
    Margolis, Michele F.
    Sances, Michael W.
    Valerio, Diana Camilla
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2024, 88 (01) : 214 - 241
  • [2] How to do research with self-administered surveys
    Sierles, FS
    [J]. ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 27 (02) : 104 - 113
  • [3] How to Do Research With Self-Administered Surveys
    Frederick S. Sierles
    [J]. Academic Psychiatry, 2003, 27 : 104 - 113
  • [4] Self-Administered Field Surveys on Sensitive Topics
    Nanes, Matthew
    Haim, Dotan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 8 (02) : 185 - 194
  • [5] Self-administered versus provider-administered medical abortion
    Gambir, Katherine
    Kim, Caron
    Necastro, Kelly Ann
    Ganatra, Bela
    Ngo, Thoai D.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (03):
  • [6] Self-administered online surveys. A case study: "adoptive families and their lifestyles"
    Rodriguez Jaume, Maria Jose
    Gonzalez Rio, Maria Jose
    [J]. EMPIRIA, 2014, (29): : 155 - 175
  • [7] The use of online social networks as a promotional tool for self-administered internet surveys
    Diaz de Rada, Vidal
    Casalo Arino, Luis V.
    Guinaliu Blasco, Miguel
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SOCIOLOGIA, 2016, 25 (02): : 189 - 203
  • [8] Use of administered and self-administered surveys. Do they provide similar results?
    Diaz de Rada, Vidal
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SOCIOLOGIA, 2021, 30 (01):
  • [9] Self-Reported Substance Use With Clinician Interviewers Versus Self-Administered Surveys
    Gorfinkel, Lauren
    Stohl, Malki
    Shmulewitz, Dvora
    Hasin, Deborah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL AND DRUGS, 2024, 85 (01) : 92 - 99
  • [10] FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION VERSUS MAIL DELIVERY OF SELF-ADMINISTERED QUESTIONNAIRES IN INDUSTRIAL SURVEYS
    NEBENZAHL, ID
    JAFFE, ED
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 1995, 24 (03) : 167 - 175