Comparison of different protocols for telomere length estimation by combination of quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (Q-FISH) and flow cytometry in human cancer cell lines

被引:0
|
作者
Derradji, H
Bekaert, S
Van Oostveldt, P
Baatout, S
机构
[1] CEN SCK, Belgian Nucl Res Ctr, Radiobiol Lab, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, FLTBW, Dept Mol Biotechnol, Lab Biochem & Mol Cytol, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
flow cytometry; quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridisation; telomeres; flow-FISH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The end of eukaryotic chromosomes terminates with nucleoprotein structures called telomeres. They insure several functions including capping the end of the chromosomes, ensuring their stability and protecting them from end-to-end fusion and preventing the activation of the DNA damage checkpoints. Materials and Methods: A flow-FISH methodology, i.e. quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (Q-FISH) in combination with flow cytometry, has been developed in our laboratory in order to estimate telomere length in three human cancer cell lines: K-562 (chronic myelogenous leukaemia), IM-9 (multiple myeloma) and 1301 (T cell lymphoblastic leukaemia). Telomeres were visualised after hybridisation with FITC-labelled PNA (Peptide Nucleic Acid) probes. We evaluated the most critical steps of the flow-FISH protocol to ensure reproducibility. Different methodological set ups were compared. Three fixation procedures (ethanol 80%, methanol 80% and formaldehyde 4%) were tested besides different fixation times (75 min and 60 min) as well as hybridization times (2 h and overnight). For each of these protocols the following parameters were compared: forward scatter (related to the cell size), side scatter (related to the cell granularity), DNA (FL3 and FL4 fluorescence) and PNA content (FL1 fluorescence) using an EPICS XL flow cytometer. Results: Regarding the fixation procedures, methanol proved to be the best, followed by ethanol and formaldehyde, with respect to the efficiency to measure the different parameters cited above. Indeed, fixation using methanol gave the optimal PNA signal compared to using ethanol and formaldehyde in two of the studied cell lines (K-562 and 1301); the difference observed was highly significant in the 1301 cell line. The duration of fixation did not show significant interference in the reproducibility of the results for the three cell lines studied. An overnight hybridization appeared to be more effective when compared to the 2-h hybridization in the case of the K-562 cell line. Conclusion: The most important steps of the flow-FISH technique, namely the fixative procedure, as well as the hybridization and the fixation times, were investigated. Considering the latter, suitable protocols were set up for routine and fast telomere length estimation in the cancer cell lines.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1050
页数:12
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Measurement of telomere length on tissue sections using quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (Q-FISH)
    Ferlicot, S
    Youssef, N
    Feneux, D
    Delhommeau, F
    Paradis, V
    Bedossa, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2003, 200 (05): : 661 - 666
  • [2] Measurement of Telomere Length in Lacrimal Gland Tissue Sections Using Quantitative Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (Q-FISH)
    Kawashima, M.
    Kawakita, T.
    Maida, Y.
    Kamoi, M.
    Ogawa, Y.
    Masutomi, K.
    Shimmura, S.
    Tsubota, K.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [3] Telomere length of mesothelial cells in pleural effusion measured using quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (Q-FISH) method
    Aida, S.
    Aida, J.
    Tsuura, Y.
    Naoi, M.
    Takubo, K.
    [J]. VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2016, 469 : S97 - S98
  • [4] TELOMERE LENGTH ANALYSIS OF HUMAN MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS BY HIGH-THROUGHPUT QUANTITATIVE-FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION (HT Q-FISH)
    Teng-umnuay, P.
    Yanudom, P.
    Mitupatum, T.
    Rongdet, J.
    Sripradisvarakul, T.
    [J]. CYTOTHERAPY, 2016, 18 (06) : S76 - S76
  • [5] Validation and development of quantitative flow cytometry-based fluorescence in situ hybridization for intercenter comparison of telomere length measurement
    Law, HKW
    Lau, YL
    [J]. CYTOMETRY, 2001, 43 (02): : 150 - 153
  • [6] Telomere length on bladder washing samples from patients with bladder cancer correlates with tumor characteristics flow cytometry method for quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (flow-FISH technique)
    Fernandez-Gomez, J
    Barmadah, SE
    Gosalbez, D
    Rodriguez-Faba, O
    Jalon, A
    Gonzalez, R
    Miralles, TG
    Calas, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (03) : 432 - 437
  • [7] Comparison of Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization and Flow Cytometry (Flow-FISH) with Monochrome Multiplex Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (MM-qPCR) for Telomere Length Screening in Adult Patients with Suspected Cryptic Dyskeratosis Congenita (DKC)
    Ferreira, Monica Sofia Ventura
    Estrada, Natalia
    Kirschner, Martin
    Xicoy, Blanca
    Bouillon, Anne-Sophie
    Wilop, Stefan
    Koschmieder, Steffen
    Panse, Jens P.
    Bruemmendorf, Tim H.
    Beier, Fabian
    [J]. BLOOD, 2018, 132
  • [8] Telomere Length of Human Adult Bronchial Epithelium and Bronchogenic Squamous Cell Carcinoma Measured Using Tissue Quantitative Fluorescence in situ Hybridization
    Aida, Shinsuke
    Aida, Junko
    Hasegawa, Kayo
    Kumasaka, Toshio
    Shimazaki, Hideyuki
    Tamai, Seiichi
    Takubo, Kaiyo
    [J]. RESPIRATION, 2015, 90 (04) : 321 - 326
  • [9] Flow cytometry-based fluorescence in situ hybridization (Flow-FISH): Quantification of telomere length in granulocytes and lymphocytes [Quantifizierung der Telomerlängen in Granulozyten und Lymphozyten: Fluoreszenz-in situ-Hybridisierung und Durchflusszytometrie (Flow-FISH)]
    Beier F.
    Böhmler A.
    Brümmendorf T.H.
    Ziegler P.
    [J]. BIOspektrum, 2013, 19 (3) : 288 - 289
  • [10] Quantification of chromosomal aberrations by multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization profile (FISH) of 9 human bladder cancer cell lines commonly used in urological oncology research
    Menard, S.
    Casas, C.
    Prada, A.
    Fan, Y-S
    Filion, M. C.
    Phillips, N. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 268 - 268