Benchmarking Different QM Levels for Usage with COSMO-RS

被引:24
|
作者
Reinisch, Jens [1 ]
Diedenhofen, Michael [1 ]
Wilcken, Rainer [2 ]
Udvarhelyi, Aniko [2 ]
Gloess, Andreas [3 ]
机构
[1] COSMOlogic GmbH & Co KG, Dassault Syst, Imbacher Weg 46, D-51379 Leverkusen, Germany
[2] Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
[3] BASF SE, Carl Bosch Str 38, D-67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany
关键词
THERMOCHEMICAL KINETICS; DENSITY FUNCTIONALS; APPROXIMATION; ACCURATE; EXCHANGE; ENERGY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00659
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The COSMO-RS method is an established method for the prediction of fluid phase properties such as activity coefficients, liquid-liquid equilibria, and free energy of solvation. It is also frequently used in quantum chemistry-based chemical reaction modeling to predict the solvation contribution to the reactions. The COSMOtherm software, which features the currently most advanced implementation of COSMO-RS, is based on quantum chemical COSMO calculations using the BP functional with the def2-TZVPD basis set. As the accuracy of COSMO-RS depends on the accuracy of the underlying quantum chemical (QC) calculation, it is important to validate the currently used level against other common, presumably superior, approaches such as the more recently developed M06-2x hybrid density functional or wave function methods such as MP2. As compared to other applications where the electronic energy is the most important result of the QC calculation, the COSMO-RS method has a much higher dependence on the molecular polarity and thus the electron density distribution. We find that MP2, PBEO, and M06-2x perform slightly worse in fully reparametrized COSMO-RS with respect to the prediction of experimentally measured properties like pK(a) or logP. Although MP2 was reported to yield better polarities than most DFT functionals for spin unpolarized molecules, this theoretical advantage does not manifest in a practical benefit for the prediction of thermodynamic properties with a refitted COSMO-RS parameter set. Other pure DFT functionals such as PBE or TPSS can be used instead of BP, but again, no practical advantage is expected as they yield extremely similar polarities to the original BP calculations.
引用
收藏
页码:4806 / 4813
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Redox Potentials with COSMO-RS: Systematic Benchmarking with Different Databases
    Tomanik, Lukas
    Rulisek, Lubomir
    Slavicek, Petr
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2023, 19 (03) : 1014 - 1022
  • [2] The COSMO and COSMO-RS solvation models
    Klamt, Andreas
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR SCIENCE, 2011, 1 (05) : 699 - 709
  • [3] The COSMO and COSMO-RS solvation models
    Klamt, Andreas
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR SCIENCE, 2018, 8 (01)
  • [4] Refinement and parametrization of COSMO-RS
    Klamt, A
    Jonas, V
    Bürger, T
    Lohrenz, JCW
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 1998, 102 (26): : 5074 - 5085
  • [5] COSMO-RS as a Predictive Tool for Lipophilicity
    Wittekindt, Carsten
    Klamt, Andreas
    QSAR & COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE, 2009, 28 (08): : 874 - 877
  • [6] Prediction of halocarbon thermodynamics with COSMO-RS
    Eckert, F
    Marat, A
    FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 2003, 210 (01) : 117 - 141
  • [7] COSMO-RS for aqueous solvation and interfaces
    Klamt, Andreas
    FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 2016, 407 : 152 - 158
  • [8] Performance of COSMO-RS with sigma profiles from different model chemistries
    Mu, Tiancheng
    Rarey, Juergen
    Gmehling, Juergen
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2007, 46 (20) : 6612 - 6629
  • [9] COSMO-RS Calculations of Partition Coefficients: Different Tools for Conformational Search
    Buggert, Matthias
    Cadena, Cesar
    Mokrushina, Liudmila
    Smirnova, Irina
    Maginn, Edward J.
    Arlt, Wolfgang
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 32 (06) : 977 - 986
  • [10] Theory and application of the novel Direct COSMO-RS model (D-COSMO-RS)
    Diedenhofen, Michael
    Klamt, Andreas
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 232 : 249 - 249