Uncovering the Effect of European Policy-Making Initiatives in Addressing Nutrition-Related Issues: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis on Front-of-Pack Labels
被引:8
|
作者:
Mazzu, Marco Francesco
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Luiss Business Sch, Via Nomentana 216, I-00162 Rome, ItalyLuiss Business Sch, Via Nomentana 216, I-00162 Rome, Italy
Mazzu, Marco Francesco
[1
]
Baccelloni, Angelo
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Sapienza Univ, Dept Commun & Social Res, Via Salaria 113, I-00198 Rome, ItalyLuiss Business Sch, Via Nomentana 216, I-00162 Rome, Italy
Baccelloni, Angelo
[2
]
Finistauri, Piera
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Luiss Univ, Dept Business & Management, Viale Romania 32, I-00197 Rome, ItalyLuiss Business Sch, Via Nomentana 216, I-00162 Rome, Italy
Finistauri, Piera
[3
]
机构:
[1] Luiss Business Sch, Via Nomentana 216, I-00162 Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ, Dept Commun & Social Res, Via Salaria 113, I-00198 Rome, Italy
[3] Luiss Univ, Dept Business & Management, Viale Romania 32, I-00197 Rome, Italy
The last decades have been marked by the introduction of front-of-pack labels (FoPL) as an institutional corrective action against obesity and nutrition-related illnesses. However, FoPL-related policy-making initiatives issued by the European Union evolved over time and led to a diversity of labels with different effects on consumers' decisions. As a result, the extant literature adapted to the regulative scenario over the years and investigated the effects of the labels, creating consensus on some topics while being fragmented on others. Similarly, policy-makers adapted some regulations to the evidence supported by the research. With the aim to systematize the overall structure and evolution of the literature on FoPL, investigate the presence of a consensus on specific topics through a co-citation analysis, and examine the evolution of the consensus and co-citation networks over the years and potential research gaps, we report the results of bibliometric and co-citation analyses and a systematic literature review involving 170 papers and a selection of 49 articles published in the last months, for a total of 219 articles, analysed according to three timespans (Period 1 (1989-2011); Period 2 (2012-2016) and Period 3 (2017-2022)). Our findings highlight the interplay of policy development and FoPL research, the presence of few self-reinforcing and well-established co-citation networks based on validated evidence in the literature and the presence of alternative emerging theories that offer different and valid perspectives overlooked by mainstream co-citation research networks.