Mercury control for coal-fired power plants

被引:1
|
作者
Hall, Robert E. [1 ]
Lee, Chun-Wai [1 ]
Hutson, Nick D. [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Natl Risk Management Res Lab E305 01, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
关键词
mercury (Hg); oxides of nitrogen (NOx); sulfur oxides (SOx); particulate matter (PM);
D O I
10.1007/978-3-540-76694-0_158
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mercury is a toxic, persistent pollutant that accumulates in the food chain, especially in fish, and causes major environmental health concerns. There are many sources of natural and anthropogenic emissions, but combustion of coal is known to be the major anthropogenic source of mercury (Hg) emissions in the U.S. and worldwide. To address this, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recently promulgated the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR) to reduce Hg emissions from coal-fired utility boilers. This rule makes the United States the first country in the world to regulate mercury emissions from such plants. However, atmospheric mercury is a global problem and mercury emissions from U.S. coal-fired boilers represent only a small fraction of the total worldwide emissions. Mercury emissions from Asia-especially from countries with rapidly growing economies, such as China and India-account for almost 60% of worldwide anthropogenic mercury emissions. Mercury can be controlled as a co-benefit of existing NOx, SOx, and PM control technologies and via sorbent injection technology. The level of control is strongly affected by the type of mercury emitted (elemental, ionic, or particulate-bound), coal type, chlorine levels, and type of air pollution controls used. With knowledge of the impact of each of these, mercury can be controlled, and improved methods to achieve further control can be developed.
引用
收藏
页码:850 / 854
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants
    Pavlish, JH
    Sondreal, EA
    Mann, MD
    Olson, ES
    Galbreath, KC
    Laudal, DL
    Benson, SA
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 82 (2-3) : 89 - 165
  • [2] Mercury Partitioning in Coal-fired Power Plants in Japan
    Noda, Naoki
    Ito, Shigeo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN INSTITUTE OF ENERGY, 2018, 97 (11) : 342 - 347
  • [3] Mercury policy and regulations for coal-fired power plants
    Rallo, Manuela
    Lopez-Anton, M. Antonia
    Contreras, M. Luisa
    Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2012, 19 (04) : 1084 - 1096
  • [4] Mercury Removal Characteristics of Coal-Fired Power Plants
    Yang Liguo
    Fan Xiaoxu
    DuanYufeng
    Wang Yunjun
    [J]. 2013 THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEM DESIGN AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS (ISDEA), 2013, : 930 - 933
  • [5] Alberta mercury regulation for coal-fired power plants
    Valupadas, Prasad
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 90 (11) : 1339 - 1342
  • [6] Mercury emission from coal-fired power plants
    Chmielniak, Tomasz
    Glod, Krzysztof
    Misztal, Edyta
    Kopczynski, Marcin
    [J]. PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2010, 89 (06): : 775 - 778
  • [7] Coal-fired power plants reduce mercury in fish
    不详
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2010, 60 (12) : 2165 - 2165
  • [8] The fate and behavior of mercury in coal-fired power plants
    Meij, R
    Vredenbregt, LHJ
    Winkel, HT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2002, 52 (08): : 912 - 917
  • [9] Mercury policy and regulations for coal-fired power plants
    Manuela Rallo
    M. Antonia Lopez-Anton
    M. Luisa Contreras
    M. Mercedes Maroto-Valer
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2012, 19 : 1084 - 1096
  • [10] Novel sorbents for mercury emissions control from coal-fired power plants
    Lee, Sang-Sup
    Lee, Joo-Youp
    Keener, Tim C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2008, 39 (02): : 137 - 142