The disappearing budget constraint on EU agricultural policy

被引:3
|
作者
Matthews, A
机构
[1] Department of Economics, Trinity College, University of Dublin
关键词
EU enlargement; FEOGA Guarantee Section; EU budget; agricultural policy;
D O I
10.1016/0306-9192(96)00006-1
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Concern over budgetary costs has been the traditional driving force behind changes to the EU's Common Agricultural Policy. While the recent MacSharry reform of this policy was more related to external pressures arising from the need to reach an agreement on agriculture in the GATT Uruguay Round, many expect the budgetary constraint to re-emerge towards the end of this decade, particularly in the light of the impending accession of a number of Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs). This paper argues that it is unlikely that there will be any budgetary need to further reform Europe's agricultural policy to accommodate the CEECs. Applying the agricultural guideline to estimate resources and using a simple forecasting model of FEOGA Guarantee budget expenditure, the paper demonstrates that, under a range of plausible assumptions for the key variables affecting resources and expenditure, a significant positive margin should emerge between available resources and the cost of EU agricultural policy by the beginning of the next decade. This margin should be sufficient to pay the estimated costs of extending the present CAP to the CEEC countries without further significant reform. However, even though the budget constraint on EU farm policy may disappear, other factors, such as GATT disciplines and concern about agriculture's impact on the environment, will remain as pressures for further CAP reform. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 508
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Budget and tax policy in the EU
    Caesar, R
    [J]. JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK, 2002, 222 (01): : 132 - 150
  • [2] Budget of the EU and Common Agricultural Policy for 2014-2020 in the light of the polish interests
    Czyzewski, Andrzej
    Stepien, Sebastian
    [J]. MANAGEMENT-POLAND, 2014, 18 (01): : 473 - 487
  • [3] Budget Constraint Fulfilment in Some EU Candidate Countries
    Jaksic, Miomir
    Jesic, Milutin
    [J]. MONTENEGRIN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 12 (02) : 101 - 115
  • [4] Common;agricultural policy, common budget?
    Halmai, Peter
    [J]. PUBLIC FINANCE QUARTERLY-HUNGARY, 2007, 52 (01): : 92 - 105
  • [5] Policy burdens, accountability, and the soft budget constraint
    Lin, JYF
    Tan, GF
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (02): : 426 - 431
  • [6] EU Agricultural Law and Policy
    O'Connor, Bernard
    [J]. EUROPEAN LAW REVIEW, 2019, 44 (05) : 734 - 737
  • [7] Agricultural policy in the EU and Germany
    Strohmeier, RW
    [J]. ARCHIV FUR TIERZUCHT-ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL BREEDING, 1997, 40 : 10 - 14
  • [8] Policy burden, privatization and soft budget constraint
    Lin, Justin Yifu
    Li, Zhiyun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2008, 36 (01) : 90 - 102
  • [9] Jobs and agricultural policy: Impact of the common agricultural policy on EU agricultural employment
    Garrone, Maria
    Emmers, Dorien
    Olper, Alessandro
    Swinnen, Johan
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2019, 87
  • [10] Statement on current issues related to EU finances and the EU agricultural budget
    Isermeyer, Folkhard
    Otte, Annette
    Dabbert, Stephan
    Frohberg, Klaus
    Grabski-Kieron, Ulrike
    Hartung, Jorg
    Heissenhuber, Alois
    Hess, Jorgen
    Inhetveen, Heide
    Kalm, Ernst
    Kirschke, Dieter
    Schmitz, Peter Michael
    Sundrum, Albert
    Thoroe, Carsten
    Weindlmaier, Hannes
    [J]. BERICHTE UBER LANDWIRTSCHAFT, 2006, 84 (01): : 5 - 16