On CMORPH Rainfall for Streamflow Simulation in a Small, Hortonian Watershed

被引:16
|
作者
Zeweldi, Dawit A.
Gebremichael, Mekonnen [1 ]
Downer, Charles W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] USA, Coastal & Hydraul Lab, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Vicksburg, MS USA
关键词
PRECIPITATION PRODUCTS; CALIBRATION; GAUGE; BASIN;
D O I
10.1175/2010JHM1270.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The objective is to assess the use of the Climate Prediction Center morphing method (CMORPH) (similar to 0.073 degrees latitude-longitude, 30 min resolution) rainfall product as input to the physics-based fully distributed Gridded Surface-Subsurface Hydrologic Analysis (GSSHA) model for streamflow simulation in the small (21.4 km(2)) Hortonian watershed of the Goodwin Creek experimental watershed located in northern Mississippi. Calibration is performed in two different ways: using rainfall data from a dense network of 30 gauges as input, and using CMORPH rainfall data as input. The study period covers 4 years, during which there were 24 events, each with peak flow rate higher than 0.5 m(3) s(-1). Streamflow simulations using CMORPH rainfall are compared against observed streamflows and streamflow simulations using rainfall from a dense rain gauge network. Results show that the CMORPH simulations captured all 24 events. The CMORPH simulations have comparable performance with gauge simulations, which is striking given the significant differences in the spatial scale between the rain gauge network and CMORPH. This study concludes that CMORPH rainfall products have potential value for streamflow simulation in such small watersheds. Overall, the performance of CMORPH-driven simulations increases when the model is calibrated with CMORPH data than when the model is calibrated with rain gauge data.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 466
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Propagation of CMORPH rainfall errors to REW streamflow simulation mismatch in the upper Zambezi Basin
    Gumindoga, W.
    Rientjes, T. H. M.
    Haile, A. T.
    Reggiani, P.
    Makurira, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2021, 38
  • [2] Peak discharge scaling in small hortonian watershed
    Ogden, FL
    Dawdy, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2003, 8 (02) : 64 - 73
  • [3] Evaluation of High-Resolution Satellite Rainfall Products through Streamflow Simulation in a Hydrological Modeling of a Small Mountainous Watershed in Ethiopia
    Bitew, Menberu M.
    Gebremichael, Mekonnen
    Ghebremichael, Lula T.
    Bayissa, Yared A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2012, 13 (01) : 338 - 350
  • [4] REFORESTATION INFLUENCES ON SMALL WATERSHED STREAMFLOW
    MCGUINNESS, JL
    HARROLD, LL
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1971, 7 (04) : 845 - +
  • [5] EFFECT OF RAINFALL VARIABILITY ON STREAMFLOW SIMULATION
    DAWDY, DR
    BERGMANN, JM
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1969, 5 (05) : 958 - &
  • [6] EFFECT OF RAINFALL VARIABILITY ON STREAMFLOW SIMULATION
    BERGMANN, JM
    DAWDY, DR
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1968, 49 (04): : 679 - &
  • [7] Streamflow predictions in a small urban-rural watershed: The effects of radar rainfall resolution and urban rainfall-runoff dynamics
    Grimley L.E.
    Quintero F.
    Krajewski W.F.
    [J]. Grimley, Lauren E. (lgrimley@unc.edu), 1600, MDPI AG, Postfach, Basel, CH-4005, Switzerland (11):
  • [8] Streamflow Predictions in a Small Urban-Rural Watershed: The Effects of Radar Rainfall Resolution and Urban Rainfall-Runoff Dynamics
    Grimley, Lauren E.
    Quintero, Felipe
    Krajewski, Witold F.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (08)
  • [9] CORRELATION AND VARIABILITY OF RAINFALL AND STREAMFLOW IN THE PIQUIRI-PR WATERSHED
    Guimaraes Correa, Marcio Greyck
    Galvani, Emerson
    [J]. GEO UERJ, 2019, (34):
  • [10] Characterizing ponds in a watershed simulation and evaluating their influence on streamflow in a Mississippi watershed
    Yasarer, Lindsey M. W.
    Bingner, Ronald L.
    Momm, Henrique G.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2018, 63 (02): : 302 - 311