Analysis of stimulus-evoked pain in patients with myofascial temporomandibular pain disorders

被引:122
|
作者
Svensson, P
List, T
Hector, G
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Orofacial Pain Lab, Ctr Sensory Motor Interact, DK-9220 Aalborg S, Denmark
[2] Univ Aarhus, Royal Dent Coll, Dept Prosthet Dent & Stomatognath Physiol, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aalborg Hosp, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Aalborg, Denmark
[4] Specialist Ctr Oral Rehabil, TMD Unit, Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
human experimental muscle pain; pressure pain thresholds; thermal heat pain thresholds; trigeminal pain mechanisms; temporomandibular disorders;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00284-6
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The pathophysiological mechanisms of myofascial temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are still under investigation. The hypothesis that TMD pain is caused by a generalized sensitization of higher order neurons in the nociceptive pathways combined with a decreased efficacy of endogenous inhibitory systems has recently gained support in the literature. This study was designed to further investigate the somatosensory sensibility within and outside the craniofacial region. Twenty-two patients fulfilled the research diagnostic criteria for TMD for myofascial pain (Dworkin and LeResche, J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain 6 (1992) 301) and 21 age- and sex-matched subjects served as a control group. The somatosensory sensibility to a deep tonic input was tested by standardized infusions of hypertonic saline into the masseter and anterior tibialis muscle. Furthermore, pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and heat pain thresholds (HPTs) were assessed with phasic stimuli at the same sites before and following the infusions. Myofascial TMD patients reported infusion of hypertonic saline to be more painful on 10 cm visual analogue scales (peak pain 8.8 +/- 0.4 cm) than control subjects (6.8 +/- 0.5 cm, t-test: P = 0.003) in the masseter but not in the anterior tibialis (7.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 6.6 +/- 0.5 cm, P = 0.181). The perceived area of experimental masseter pain measured on drawings was marginally larger in TMD patients (2.6 +/- 0.5 arbitrary units (a.u.)) than in control subjects (1.4 +/- 0.2 a.u., Mann-Whitney: P = 0.048) but no differences were observed for the anterior tibialis (P = 0.771). The PPTs were lower in the myofascial TMD patients compared to the control group, both in the masseter (analysis of variance (ANOVA): P = 0.002) and in the anterior tibialis (P = 0.005), whereas there were no significant differences in HPT (ANOVAs: P = 0.357, P = 0.101). There were no significant correlations between measures of somatosensory sensibility and measures of clinical pain intensity, pain duration, graded chronic pain scores or somatization or depression scores (Pearson: R < 0.304, P > 0.172). The present study in a well-defined group of myofascial TMD patients found that the responsiveness to both tonic and phasic deep stimuli, but not to phasic superficial inputs at the pain threshold level, in the craniofacial region was higher compared with a control group. These findings suggest that myofascial TMD pain is associated with a facilitation of stimulus-evoked pain primarily, but not exclusively related to the painful region. (C) 2001 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 409
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Objective Measure of Stimulus-Evoked Pain
    Kramer, John L. K.
    Haefeli, Jenny
    Jutzeler, Catherine R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 32 (38): : 12981 - 12982
  • [2] SYSTEMIC ADENOSINE INFUSION ALLEVIATES SPONTANEOUS AND STIMULUS-EVOKED PAIN IN PATIENTS WITH PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHIC PAIN
    BELFRAGE, M
    SOLLEVI, A
    SEGERDAHL, M
    SJOLUND, KF
    HANSSON, P
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (04): : 713 - 717
  • [3] Dispositional Mindfulness and Acute Heat Pain: Comparing Stimulus-Evoked Pain With Summary Pain Assessment
    Mischkowski, Dominik
    Stavish, Caitlin M.
    Palacios-Barrios, Esther E.
    Banker, Lauren A.
    Dildine, Troy C.
    Atlas, Lauren Y.
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2021, 83 (06) : 539 - 548
  • [4] Headache attributed to temporomandibular disorders and masticatory myofascial pain
    Hara, Kazuhiko
    Shinozaki, Takahiro
    Okada-Ogawa, Akiko
    Matsukawa, Yumiko
    Dezawa, Ko
    Nakaya, Yuka
    Chen, Jui-Yen
    Noma, Noboru
    Oka, Shunichi
    Iwata, Koichi
    Imamura, Yoshiki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2016, 58 (02) : 195 - 204
  • [5] Myofascial pain in temporomandibular disorders: Updates on etiopathogenesis and management
    Kalladka, Mythili
    Young, Andrew
    Khan, Junad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2021, 28 : 104 - 113
  • [6] Sensitivity of patients with painful temporomandibular disorders to experimentally evoked pain
    Maixner, W
    Fillingim, R
    Booker, D
    Sigurdsson, A
    [J]. PAIN, 1995, 63 (03) : 341 - 351
  • [7] The influence of cranio-cervical rehabilitation in patients with myofascial temporomandibular pain disorders
    Halmova, K.
    Holly, D.
    Stanko, P.
    [J]. BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2017, 118 (11): : 710 - 713
  • [8] The Prevalence and Overlaps of Temporomandibular Disorders in Patients with Myofascial Pain with Referral-A Pilot Study
    Kuc, Joanna
    Szarejko, Krzysztof Dariusz
    Golebiewska, Maria
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (18)
  • [9] The effect of electroacupuncture on pain behaviors and noxious stimulus-evoked fos expression in a rat model of neuropathic pain
    Dai, Y
    Kondo, E
    Fukuoka, T
    Tokunaga, A
    Miki, K
    Noguchi, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2001, 2 (03): : 151 - 159
  • [10] Sensitivity of patients with painful temporomandibular disorders to experimentally evoked pain: evidence for altered temporal summation of pain
    Maixner, W
    Fillingim, R
    Sigurdsson, A
    Kincaid, S
    Silva, S
    [J]. PAIN, 1998, 76 (1-2) : 71 - 81