Optimizing model performance: variable size resolution in cloud chemistry modeling

被引:121
|
作者
Fahey, KM [1 ]
Pandis, SN [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
VSRM; droplet size resolution; aqueous-phase atmospheric chemistry models; cloud processing;
D O I
10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00224-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under many conditions size-resolved aqueous-phase chemistry models predict higher sulfate production rates than comparable bulk aqueous-phase models. However, there are special circumstances under which bulk and size-resolved models offer similar predictions. These special conditions include alkaline conditions (when there is a high ammonia to nitric acid ratio or a large amount of alkaline dust) or conditions under which the initial H2O2 concentration exceeds that Of SO2. Given that bulk models are less computationally-intensive than corresponding size-resolved models, a model equipped to combine the accuracy of the size-resolved code with the efficiency of the bulk method is proposed in this work. Bulk and two-section size-resolved approaches are combined into a single variable size-resolution model (VSRM) in an effort to combine both accuracy and computational speed. Depending on initial system conditions, bulk or size-resolved calculations are executed based on a set of semi-empirical rules. These rules were generated based on our understanding of the system and from the results of many model simulations for a range of input conditions. For the conditions examined here, on average, the VSRM sulfate predictions are within 3% of a six-section size-resolved model, but the VSRM is fifteen times faster. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4471 / 4478
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of variable droplet size-resolution in aqueous-phase atmospheric chemistry modeling
    Fahey, KM
    Pandis, SN
    AIR POLLUTION MODELLING AND SIMULATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 422 - 430
  • [2] Optimizing Variable Radius Plot Size and LiDAR Resolution to Model Standing Volume in Conifer Forests
    Deo, Ram Kumar
    Froese, Robert E.
    Falkowski, Michael J.
    Hudak, Andrew T.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 42 (05) : 428 - 442
  • [3] Variable resolution modeling
    Haag, C
    Chou, I
    Preiss, B
    ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES FOR SIMULATION SCIENCE VI, 2002, 4716 : 218 - 228
  • [4] NUMERICAL MODELING OF CUMULUS CLOUD CHEMISTRY—PART Ⅰ.MODEL DEVELOPMENT
    赵春生
    秦瑜
    Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 1996, (03) : 321 - 330
  • [5] A CLOUD CHEMISTRY SENSITIVITY STUDY AND COMPARISON OF EXPLICIT AND BULK CLOUD MODEL PERFORMANCE
    ROELOFS, GJH
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1993, 27 (15): : 2255 - 2264
  • [6] MODELING THE EFFECTS OF HETEROGENEOUS CLOUD CHEMISTRY ON THE MARINE PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION
    HEGG, DA
    YUEN, PF
    LARSON, TV
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1992, 97 (D12) : 12927 - 12933
  • [7] MODELING OF THE NIGHTTIME NITROGEN AND SULFUR CHEMISTRY IN SIZE RESOLVED DROPLETS OF AN OROGRAPHIC CLOUD
    SANDER, R
    LELIEVELD, J
    CRUTZEN, PJ
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY, 1995, 20 (01) : 89 - 116
  • [8] Deploying and optimizing performance of a 3D hydrodynamic model on cloud
    O'Donncha, Fearghal
    Venugopal, Srikumar
    James, Scott C.
    Ragnoli, Emanuele
    OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE MONTEREY, 2016,
  • [9] Cloud chemistry varies with drop size
    Bator, A
    Collett, JL
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D23) : 28071 - 28078
  • [10] Summary of the cloud chemistry modeling intercomparison: Photochemical box model simulation
    Barth, MC
    Sillman, S
    Hudman, R
    Jacobson, MZ
    Kim, CH
    Monod, A
    Liang, J
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D7)