Policy mixes for incumbency: Exploring the destructive recreation of renewable energy, shale gas 'fracking,' and nuclear power in the United Kingdom

被引:95
|
作者
Johnstone, Phil [1 ]
Stirling, Andy [3 ]
Sovacool, Benjamin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, SPRU, Sch Business Management & Econ BMEc, Room 325,Jubilee Bldg, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[2] Univ Sussex, SPRU, Sch Business Management & Econ BMEc, Room 367,Jubilee Bldg, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[3] Univ Sussex, SPRU, Sch Business Management & Econ BMEc, Room 389,Jubilee Bldg, Brighton, E Sussex, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 芬兰科学院;
关键词
Incumbency; Politics; Energy policy; Socio-technical; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; SOCIOTECHNICAL TRANSITION; REGIME DESTABILIZATION; LOCK-IN; POLITICS; SYSTEMS; ELECTRICITY; DYNAMICS; INNOVATION; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The notion of a 'policy mix' can describe interactions across a wide range of innovation policies, including 'motors for creation' as well as for 'destruction'. This paper focuses on the United Kingdom's (UK) new policy direction' that has weakened support for renewables and energy efficiency schemes while strengthening promotion of nuclear power and hydraulic fracturing for natural gas ('fracking'). The paper argues that a 'policy apparatus for incumbency' is emerging which strengthens key regime-based technologies while arguably damaging emerging niche innovations. Basing the discussion around the three technology-based cases of renewable energy and efficiency, fracking, and nuclear power, this paper refers to this process as "destructive recreation". Our study raises questions over the extent to which policymaking in the energy field is not so much driven by stated aims around sustainability transitions, as by other policy drivers. It investigates different 'strategies of incumbency' including 'securitization', 'masking', 'reinvention', and 'capture.' It suggests that analytical frameworks should extend beyond the particular sectors in focus, with notions of what counts as a relevant 'policy maker' correspondingly also expanded, in order to explore a wider range of nodes and critical junctures as entry points for understanding how relations of incumbency are forged and reproduced.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 162
页数:16
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Fair fracking? Ethics and environmental justice in United Kingdom shale gas policy and planning
    Cotton, Matthew
    [J]. LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 22 (02) : 185 - 202
  • [2] 'We're going all out for shale:' explaining shale gas energy policy failure in the United Kingdom
    Bradshaw, Michael
    Devine-Wright, Patrick
    Evensen, Darrick
    King, Owen
    Martin, Abigail
    Ryder, Stacia
    Short, Damien
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    Stretesky, Paul
    Szolucha, Anna
    Williams, Laurence
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 168
  • [3] Exploring the role of nuclear energy in the energy transition: A comparative perspective of the effects of coal, oil, natural gas, renewable energy, and nuclear power on economic growth and carbon emissions
    Wang, Qiang
    Guo, Jiale
    Li, Rongrong
    Jiang, Xue-ting
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 221