Importance of small-scale anisotropy in the turbulent/nonturbulent interface region of turbulent free shear flows

被引:7
|
作者
Buxton, O. R. H. [1 ]
Breda, M. [1 ]
Dhall, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Aeronaut, London SW7 2AZ, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
BOUNDARY;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.034603
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
There has been much debate over the past decade or so over the scaling of the thickness of the turbulent/nonturbulent (TNT) interface for turbulent shear flows. It is generally considered to consist of the outer viscous superlayer, in which viscous processes are significant, and an inner turbulent sublayer which is dominated by inertial processes. Various authors have stated that the interface thickness scales with the Taylor length scale lambda while others state that it scales with the Kolmogorov length scale eta [Buxton et al., Phys. Fluids 23, 061704 (2011)]. Frequently, only self-similar turbulent flows are considered in which a single value of either lambda or eta is sufficient to scale various phenomena, including the thickness of the TNT interface. In this paper we show that for flows which are not self-similar the local Kolmogorov length scale increases quite significantly as one moves closer to the boundary between the turbulent and nonturbulent fluid. We find that the variation of this local Kolmogorov length scale with normal distance from the TNT boundary may be collapsed by the local Kolmogorov length scale computed from the TNT boundary itself. We subsequently show that this variation in local Kolmogorov length scale occurs concurrently with an increase in the small-scale anisotropy in the TNT interface. This anisotropy peaks at the boundary between the viscous superlayer and the turbulent sublayer, suggesting that these two sublayers are in fact quite distinct from one another. We show that these results hold for a number of different TNT interfaces from various flows and with the bulk turbulence being in a variety of states of development. The local viscous scaling that we obtain, along with an increase in anisotropy primarily driven by an increased magnitude of velocity gradients in the TNT-boundary-normal direction, leads us to draw an analogy between TNT interfaces and the wall in wall-bounded turbulence.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Small-scale aspects of flows in proximity of the turbulent/nonturbulent interface
    Holzner, M.
    Liberzon, A.
    Nikitin, N.
    Kinzelbach, W.
    Tsinober, A.
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2007, 19 (07)
  • [2] Quantifying small-scale anisotropy in turbulent flows
    Chowdhuri, Subharthi
    Banerjee, Tirtha
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS, 2024, 9 (07):
  • [3] DETECTION OF TURBULENT-NONTURBULENT INTERFACE IN SLIGHTLY HEATED TURBULENT SHEAR FLOWS
    LARUE, JC
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1974, 17 (08) : 1513 - 1517
  • [4] SMALL-SCALE INTERMITTENCY OF TURBULENT FLOWS
    BENZI, R
    VULPIANI, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL, 1980, 13 (10): : 3319 - 3324
  • [5] Behaviour of small-scale turbulence in the turbulent/non-turbulent interface region of developing turbulent jets
    Breda, M.
    Buxton, O. R. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2019, 879 : 187 - 216
  • [6] ENTRAINMENT INTERFACE IN FREE TURBULENT SHEAR FLOWS
    CHEVRAY, R
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 1982, 8 (04) : 303 - 315
  • [7] Small-scale anisotropy in turbulent boundary layers
    Pumir, Alain
    Xu, Haitao
    Siggia, Eric D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2016, 804 : 5 - 23
  • [8] Small-Scale Anisotropy in Turbulent Shearless Mixing
    Tordella, Daniela
    Iovieno, Michele
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2011, 107 (19)
  • [9] Characteristics of the turbulent/nonturbulent interface in boundary layers, jets and shear-free turbulence
    Da Silva, Carlos B.
    Taveira, Rodrigo R.
    Borrell, Guillem
    [J]. 1ST MULTIFLOW SUMMER WORKSHOP, 2014, 506
  • [10] Dissipative small-scale actuation of a turbulent shear layer
    Vukasinovic, B.
    Rusak, Z.
    Glezer, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2010, 656 : 51 - 81