Peer reviewer comments 2

被引:35
|
作者
Puschmann, A. K. [1 ]
Driesslein, D. [2 ]
Beck, H. [3 ]
Arampatzis, A. [4 ]
Catala, Moreno M. [4 ]
Schiltenwolf, M. [5 ]
Mayer, F. [6 ]
Wippert, P. M. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Sociol Hlth & Phys Act, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Stat Consulting Unit, Munich, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Ctr Orthoped & Surg, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
[4] Humboldt Univ, Dept Training & Movement Sci, Berlin, Germany
[5] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Ctr Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Conservat Orthopaed & Pain Management, Heidelberg, Germany
[6] Univ Potsdam, Univ Outpatient Clin, Potsdam, Germany
[7] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH | 2020年 / 13卷
关键词
low back pain; psychosocial risk factors; stress; self-efficacy; MiSpEx; LOW-BACK-PAIN; PSYCHOLOGICAL RISK-FACTORS; SELF-EFFICACY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STRESS; DEPRESSION; SYMPTOMS; QUESTIONNAIRE; INTEGRATION; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S223893
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Psychosocial variables are known risk factors for the development and chronification of low back pain (LBP). Psychosocial stress is one of these risk factors. Therefore, this study aims to identify the most important types of stress predicting LBP. Self-efficacy was included as a potential protective factor related to both, stress and pain. Participants and Methods: This prospective observational study assessed n = 1071 subjects with low back pain over 2 years. Psychosocial stress was evaluated in a broad manner using instruments assessing perceived stress, stress experiences in work and social contexts, vital exhaustion and life-event stress. Further, self-efficacy and pain (characteristic pain intensity and disability) were assessed. Using least absolute shrinkage selection operator regression, important predictors of characteristic pain intensity and pain-related disability at 1-year and 2-years follow-up were analyzed. Results: The final sample for the statistic procedure consisted of 588 subjects (age: 39.2 (+/- 13.4) years; baseline pain intensity: 27.8 (+/- 18.4); disability: 14.3 (+/- 17.9)). In the 1-year follow-up, the stress types "tendency to worry", "social isolation", "work discontent" as well as vital exhaustion and negative life events were identified as risk factors for both pain intensity and pain-related disability. Within the 2-years follow-up, Lasso models identified the stress types "tendency to worry", "social isolation", "social conflicts", and "perceived long-term stress" as potential risk factors for both pain intensity and disability. Furthermore, "self-efficacy" ("internality", "self-concept") and "social externality" play a role in reducing pain-related disability. Conclusion: Stress experiences in social and work-related contexts were identified as important risk factors for LBP 1 or 2 years in the future, even in subjects with low initial pain levels. Self-efficacy turned out to be a protective factor for pain development, especially in the long-term follow-up. Results suggest a differentiation of stress types in addressing psychosocial factors in research, prevention and therapy approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Leveraging peer-reviewer comments
    Fay, Lorna
    Mooney, LaVerne A.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2014, 30 : S15 - S15
  • [2] Strategies to Manage Unclear Peer Reviewer Comments
    Conn, Vicki S.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2022, 44 (11) : 991 - 991
  • [4] EPA ACTIONS ON PEER REVIEWER COMMENTS DEEMED LEGAL
    不详
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2009, 87 (04) : 24 - 24
  • [5] Don't be reviewer 2! Reflections on writing effective peer review comments
    Watling, Chris
    Ginsburg, Shiphra
    Lingard, Lorelei
    PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 10 (05) : 299 - 303
  • [6] Peer reviewer fatigue, or peer reviewer refusal?
    Beecher, Kate
    Wang, Joshua
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2025,
  • [7] COMMENTS OF THE REVIEWER
    Vysotsky, S. V.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PACIFIC GEOLOGY, 2010, 4 (05) : 426 - 428
  • [8] REVIEWER COMMENTS
    不详
    CONNECTIVE TISSUE RESEARCH, 2020, 61 (05) : 422 - 423
  • [9] JACLP Guide for Manuscript Peer Review: How to Perform a Peer Review and How to Be Responsive to Reviewer Comments
    Oldham, Mark A.
    Kontos, Nicholas
    Baller, Erica
    Cerimele, Joseph M.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF CONSULTATION-LIAISON PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 64 (05): : 468 - 472
  • [10] The Role of the Peer Reviewer
    Jacobson, Robert M.
    Fairbrother, Gerry
    Sheldrick, R. Christopher
    Szilagyi, Peter G.
    ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2017, 17 (02) : 105 - 106