Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A systematic review

被引:46
|
作者
Milette, Katherine [1 ,2 ]
Roseman, Michelle [1 ,2 ]
Thombs, Brett D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Jewish Gen Hosp, Lady Davis Inst Med Res, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E4, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Jewish Gen Hosp, Lady Davis Inst Med Res, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Community Studies, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E4, Canada
[6] Jewish Gen Hosp, Lady Davis Inst Med Res, Div Rheumatol, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E4, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Methods; Review; Systematic; Randomized controlled trials at topic; Behavioral medicine; Psychosomatic medicine; BREAST-CANCER SURVIVORS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SMOKING-CESSATION; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; REDUCTION INTERVENTION; VEGETABLE INTERVENTION; PREVENTION PROGRAMS; STRESS-MANAGEMENT; PUBLICATION BIAS; DECISION-MAKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.09.015
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: The most reliable evidence for evaluating healthcare interventions comes from well-designed and conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The extent to which published RCTs reflect the efficacy of interventions, however, depends on the completeness and accuracy of published results. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement, initially developed in 1996, provides guidelines intended to improve the transparency of published RCT reports. A policy of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, initiated in 2005, requires clinical trials published in member journals to be registered in publicly accessible registries prior to patient enrollment. The objective of this study was to assess the clarity of outcome reporting, proportion of registered trials, and adequacy of outcome registration in RCTs published in top behavioral health journals. Methods: Eligible studies were primary or secondary reports of RCTs published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Health Psychology, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, and Psychosomatic Medicine from January 2008 to September 2009. Data were extracted for each study on adequacy of outcome reporting and registration. Results: Of 63 articles reviewed, only 25 (39.7%) had adequately declared primary or secondary outcomes, whereas 38 (60.3%) had multiple primary outcomes or did not define outcomes. Only 13 studies (20.6%) were registered. Only 1 study registered sufficiently precise outcome information to compare with published outcomes, and registered and published outcomes were discrepant in that study. Conclusion: Greater attention to outcome reporting and trial registration by researchers, peer reviewers, and journal editors will increase the likelihood that effective behavioral health interventions are readily identified and made available to patients. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 217
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A 5-year follow-up
    Riehm, Kira E.
    Azar, Marleine
    Thombs, Brett D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2015, 79 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [2] A systematic review of trial registration and selective outcome reporting in psychotherapy randomized controlled trials
    Bradley, H. A.
    Rucklidge, J. J.
    Mulder, R. T.
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 135 (01) : 65 - 77
  • [3] Transparency of Outcome Reporting and Trial Registration of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
    Azar, Marleine
    Riehm, Kira E.
    McKay, Dean
    Thombs, Brett D.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11):
  • [4] Clinical Trial Registration And Adherence To Reporting Guidelines In Top Anesthesiology Journals: A Systematic Review
    Moore, Michael S.
    Ross, Andrew
    Young, Jeff
    Vassar, Matt
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 124 : 277 - 277
  • [5] Registration and primary outcome reporting in behavioral health trials
    Taylor, Nicholas J.
    Gorman, Dennis M.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [6] Registration and primary outcome reporting in behavioral health trials
    Nicholas J. Taylor
    Dennis M. Gorman
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22
  • [7] Prospective Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Eczema Treatments: A Systematic Review
    Nankervis, Helen
    Baibergenova, Akerke
    Williams, Hywel C.
    Thomas, Kim S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 132 (12) : 2727 - 2734
  • [8] REPORTING OF NEGATIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS IN THREE MAJOR MEDICAL JOURNALS: EFFECT OF TRIAL REGISTRATION
    Brooks, Gabriel
    Prochazka, Allan
    Gopal, Ravi
    Huang, Janice
    Smart, Alexandra
    Bowles, Daniel
    Yamashita, Traci
    Jamieson, Daniel
    Heist, Kathleen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 25 : 384 - 385
  • [9] Outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of gastroschisis treatment: a systematic review
    Ross, Andrew R.
    Hall, Nigel J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2016, 51 (08) : 1385 - 1389
  • [10] Skin color reporting in squamous cell carcinoma-related randomized controlled trials in top dermatology journals: a systematic review
    Salmen, Natasha L.
    Menage, Klarens
    Baumann, Anthony N.
    Curtis, Deven P.
    Brodell, Robert T.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 316 (04)