Consumers' choice-blindness to ingredient information

被引:27
|
作者
Cheung, T. T. L. [1 ]
Junghans, A. F. [1 ]
Dijksterhuis, G. B. [2 ]
Kroese, F. [1 ]
Johansson, P. [3 ]
Hall, L. [3 ]
De Ridder, D. T. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Psychol, Heidelberglaan 1, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Sensory & Consumer Sci Sect, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Lund Univ Cognit Sci, Lund, Sweden
关键词
Choice-blindness paradigm; Food choice; Ingredient information; Attention; Clean label; FOOD; HEALTH; INTENTION; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.022
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Food manufacturers and policy makers have been tailoring food product ingredient information to consumers' self-reported preference for natural products and concerns over food additives. Yet, the influence of this ingredient information on consumers remains inconclusive. The current study aimed at examining the first step in such influence, which is consumers' attention to ingredient information on food product packaging. Employing the choice-blindness paradigm, the current study assessed whether participants would detect a covertly made change to the naturalness of ingredient list throughout a product evaluation procedure. Results revealed that only few consumers detected the change on the ingredient lists. Detection was improved when consumers were instructed to judge the naturalness of the product as compared to evaluating the product in general. These findings challenge consumers' self-reported use of ingredient lists as a source of information throughout product evaluations. While most consumers do not attend to ingredient information, this tendency can be slightly improved by prompting their consideration of naturalness. Future research should investigate the reasons for consumers' inattention to ingredient information and develop more effective strategies for conveying information to consumers. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 12
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reducing Choice-Blindness? An Experimental Study Comparing Experienced Meditators to Non-Meditators
    Lachaud, Lea
    Jacquet, Baptiste
    Baratgin, Jean
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATION IN HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 2022, 12 (11) : 1607 - 1620
  • [2] The role of information sources in touristic consumers' choice
    Molina Collado, Arturo
    Blazquez Resino, Juan Jose
    [J]. ESIC MARKET, 2005, : 243 - 262
  • [3] Ingredient and nutrition information labelling of alcoholic beverages: do consumers want it?
    Kypri, Kypros
    McManus, Alexandra
    Howat, Peter M.
    Maycock, Bruce R.
    Hallett, Jonathan D.
    Chikritzhs, Tanya N.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2007, 187 (11-12) : 669 - 669
  • [4] Consumers' valuation of nutritional information: A choice experiment study
    Gracia, Azucena
    Loureiro, Maria L.
    Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr.
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2009, 20 (07) : 463 - 471
  • [5] Perceived Choice Freedom and Consumers' Receptiveness to Persuasive Information
    Yuan, Wentao
    Dhar, Ravi
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, VOL 35, 2008, 35 : 251 - 252
  • [6] From change blindness to choice blindness
    Johansson, Petter
    Hall, Lars
    Sikstroem, Sverker
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGIA, 2008, 51 (02) : 142 - 155
  • [7] Consumers' reactions to nutrition and ingredient labelling for wine - A cross-country discrete choice experiment
    Pabst, Evelyn
    Corsi, Armando Maria
    Vecchio, Riccardo
    Annunziata, Azzurra
    Loose, Simone Mueller
    [J]. APPETITE, 2021, 156
  • [8] RISK INDICATORS, PERCEIVED RISK AND CONSUMERS CHOICE OF INFORMATION SOURCES
    GRONHAUG, K
    [J]. SWEDISH JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1972, 74 (02): : 246 - 262
  • [9] Haptic choice blindness
    Steenfeldt-Kristensen, Catherine
    Thornton, Ian M.
    [J]. I-PERCEPTION, 2013, 4 (03): : 207 - 210
  • [10] CONSUMERS CHOICE
    不详
    [J]. ECONOMIST, 1961, 199 (07): : 676 - 676