Simplified Frechet Distance for Generative Adversarial Nets

被引:17
|
作者
Kim, Chung-Il [1 ]
Kim, Meejoung [2 ]
Jung, Seungwon [1 ]
Hwang, Eenjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Res Inst Informat & Commun Technol, Seoul 02841, South Korea
关键词
image processing; generative models; generative adversarial net;
D O I
10.3390/s20061548
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We introduce a distance metric between two distributions and propose a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) model: the Simplified Frechet distance (SFD) and the Simplified Frechet GAN (SFGAN). Although the data generated through GANs are similar to real data, GAN often undergoes unstable training due to its adversarial structure. A possible solution to this problem is considering Frechet distance (FD). However, FD is unfeasible to realize due to its covariance term. SFD overcomes the complexity so that it enables us to realize in networks. The structure of SFGAN is based on the Boundary Equilibrium GAN (BEGAN) while using SFD in loss functions. Experiments are conducted with several datasets, including CelebA and CIFAR-10. The losses and generated samples of SFGAN and BEGAN are compared with several distance metrics. The evidence of mode collapse and/or mode drop does not occur until 3000k steps for SFGAN, while it occurs between 457k and 968k steps for BEGAN. Experimental results show that SFD makes GANs more stable than other distance metrics used in GANs, and SFD compensates for the weakness of models based on BEGAN-based network structure. Based on the experimental results, we can conclude that SFD is more suitable for GAN than other metrics.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Frechet AutoEncoder Distance: A new approach for evaluation of Generative Adversarial Networks
    Buzuti, Lucas F.
    Thomaz, Carlos E.
    COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2023, 235
  • [2] Determining overfitting and underfitting in generative adversarial networks using Frechet distance
    Eken, Enes
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2021, 29 (03) : 1524 - 1538
  • [3] Generative Adversarial Nets
    Goodfellow, Ian J.
    Pouget-Abadie, Jean
    Mirza, Mehdi
    Xu, Bing
    Warde-Farley, David
    Ozair, Sherjil
    Courville, Aaron
    Bengio, Yoshua
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 27 (NIPS 2014), 2014, 27 : 2672 - 2680
  • [4] Using subspaces of weight matrix for evaluating generative adversarial networks with Frechet distance
    Eken, Enes
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2022, 34 (01):
  • [5] Generative Adversarial Ranking Nets
    Yao, Yinghua
    Pan, Yuangang
    Li, Jing
    Tsang, Ivor W.
    Yao, Xin
    JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2024, 25 : 1 - 35
  • [6] Lipschitz Generative Adversarial Nets
    Zhou, Zhiming
    Liang, Jiadong
    Song, Yuxuan
    Yu, Lantao
    Wang, Hongwei
    Zhang, Weinan
    Yu, Yong
    Zhang, Zhihua
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 97, 2019, 97
  • [7] Triple Generative Adversarial Nets
    Li, Chongxuan
    Xu, Kun
    Zhu, Jun
    Zhang, Bo
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 30 (NIPS 2017), 2017, 30
  • [8] Generative adversarial dehaze mapping nets
    Li, Ce
    Zhao, Xinyu
    Zhang, Zhaoxiang
    Du, Shaoyi
    PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2019, 119 : 238 - 244
  • [9] Improved triple generative adversarial nets
    Liu, Yaqiu
    Zhao, Qinghua
    Lv, Yunlei
    Wang, Kun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 59 (02) : 114 - 122
  • [10] Interference suppression generative adversarial nets
    Li C.
    Jiang Y.
    Liu F.
    Jia S.
    Li S.
    Guofang Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2020, 42 (05): : 1 - 8