A randomized controlled trial comparing early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section under regional anesthesia

被引:6
|
作者
Mawson, Apinun Luksanachinda [1 ]
Bumrungphuet, Sommart [1 ]
Manonai, Jittima [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Ramathibodi Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 270 Rama VI Rd, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
来源
关键词
early oral feeding; cesarean section; maternal satisfaction; bowel function; gastrointestinal complication; randomized controlled trial; DELIVERY; INITIATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.2147/IJWH.S222922
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the return of bowel movements in regionally anesthetized women undergoing cesarean section (C-section) given Early Oral Feeding (EOF) to that of women given Late Oral Feeding (LOF). Secondary outcomes of maternal satisfaction and gastrointestinal complications were also examined. Methods: In a single-blinded randomized controlled trial (TCTR20181202001), 148 singleton pregnant women undergoing elective C-sections with regional anesthesia were assigned to receive either EOF or LOF. Participants began to sip water at 6-8 hrs or more than 12 hrs post-operation, for EOF or LOF respectively. Participants were then placed onto a stepping diet as tolerated. Participants failing to tolerate the stepping diet or those having surgical complications were excluded from the study. Results: After exclusion, 69 women remained in the EOF group and 67 in the LOF group. The ages of participants ranged from 19 to 42, with a mean of 32.07. There was no-loss follow up and no significant difference in patient characteristics, except the site of the surgical incision. Participants given EOF were more likely to experience bowel sound the next morning than patients given LOF (EOF 87.0%, LOF 44.8%, P-value<0.001). However, there was no difference in time to passing flatus and time to passing stool. Maternal satisfaction regarding hunger (EOF 3.78 +/- 0.91, LOF 3.24 +/- 1.01, P-value 0.002) and maternal satisfaction with postoperative consumption (EOF 4.38 +/- 0.64, LOF 4.13 +/- 0.48, P-value 0.049) were significantly higher in the EOF group. There was no difference in gastrointestinal complications between the groups (P-value 0.978). Conclusion: The EOF group experienced an earlier return of bowel movement and greater maternal satisfaction than the LOF group, with no difference in gastrointestinal complications. These findings support the recommendation of EOF for women who undergo uncomplicated C-sections under regional anesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 525
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized clinical trial comparing postoperative outcomes of early versus late oral feeding after cesarean section
    Jalilian, Nasrin
    Ghadami, Mohammad Rasoul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2014, 40 (06) : 1649 - 1652
  • [2] A randomized controlled trial of early oral fluid after cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
    Johnson, C
    Weeks, S
    Crochetiere, C
    Roy, L
    Sampalis, J
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 : S392 - S392
  • [3] Early versus delayed oral feeding after cesarean delivery under different anesthetic methods - a randomized controlled trial Anesthesia, feeding in cesarean delivery
    Aydin, Yunus
    Altunyurt, Sabahattin
    Oge, Tufan
    Sahin, Fezan
    [J]. GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2014, 85 (11) : 815 - 822
  • [4] Early versus Late Feeding after Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Saad, Antonio F.
    Saoud, Fawzi
    Diken, Zaid M.
    Hegde, Shruti
    Kuhlmann, Maggie J.
    Wen, Tony S.
    Hankins, Gary D.
    Saade, George R.
    Costantine, Maged M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2016, 33 (04) : 415 - 419
  • [5] Early versus late feeding after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
    Saad, Antonio
    Diken, Zaid
    Saoud, Fawzi
    Hegde, Shruti
    Kuhlmann, Maggie Joe
    Wen, Tony
    Hankins, Gary
    Saade, George
    Costantine, Maged
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : S286 - S287
  • [6] Postoperative Oral Feeding After Cesarean Section-Early Versus Late Initiation: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Mehta, Sumita
    Gupta, Sarika
    Goel, Neerja
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2010, 26 (04) : 247 - 250
  • [7] A randomised controlled trial of early initiation of oral feeding after cesarean section
    Orji, Ernest O.
    Olabode, Taofeek O.
    Kuti, Oluwafemi
    Ogunniyi, Solomon O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2009, 22 (01): : 65 - 71
  • [8] To assess the practices about initiation of Oral Maternal Feeding after Cesarean Section under Regional Anesthesia
    Masood, Shabeen Naz
    Siddiqui, Intisar A.
    Masood, Muhammed Faraz
    Masood, Yasir
    Mumtaz, Seema N.
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 27 (05) : 996 - 1000
  • [9] A randomized comparative trial of early initiation of oral maternal feeding versus conventional oral feeding after cesarean delivery
    Masood, Shabeen N.
    Masood, Yasir
    Naim, Uzma
    Masood, Muhammad F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 126 (02) : 115 - 119
  • [10] Effects of Early Oral Feeding versus Delayed Oral Feeding on Bowel Function, Gastrointestinal Complications and Surgical Recovery after Cesarean Section under Regional Anesthesia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kim, HyoJin
    Jeon, YeongKyung
    Yoon, SoYoung
    Lee, GeumMoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN ACADEMY OF NURSING, 2021, 51 (06) : 732 - 745