Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Computer Simulator Versus Usage of Box Trainer for Endoscopic Surgery Training of Novices

被引:114
|
作者
Diesen, Diana L. [1 ]
Erhunmwunsee, Loretta [1 ]
Bennett, Kyla M. [1 ]
Ben-David, Kfir [2 ]
Yurcisin, Basil [1 ]
Ceppa, Eugene P. [1 ]
Omotosho, Philip A. [1 ]
Perez, Alexander [1 ]
Pryor, Aurora [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
simulators; box trainers; virtual reality; laparoscopy; training; VIRTUAL-REALITY SIMULATION; OPERATING-ROOM PERFORMANCE; SKILLS; ACQUISITION; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.02.007
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Teaching of laparoscopic skills is a challenge in surgical training programs. Because of the highly technical nature and the steep learning curve, students and residents must learn laparoscopic skills before performing them in the operating room. To improve efficiency of learning and patient safety, research in simulation is essential. Two types of simulators currently in use include virtual reality and box trainers. Our study examined which simulator technique was most effective in teaching novice trainees laparoscopic techniques. DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled trial that enrolled fourth-year medical students and surgical interns to participate in a supervised 6-month laparoscopic training program with either computer simulators or box trainers. Subjects were randomized and trained on appropriate laparoscopic camera skills, instrument handling, object positioning, dissection, ligation, suturing, and knot tying. Students within one group were not allowed to practice, learn or train on the opposing trainers. At time points 0, 2, and 6 months all subjects completed a series of laparoscopic exercises in a live porcine model, which were captured on DVD and scored by blinded expert investigators. RESULTS: Scores improved overall from the pretest to subsequent tests after training with no difference between the virtual reality and box simulator groups. In the medical students specifically, there was overall improvement, and improvement in the needle-transfer and knot-tying skills specifically, with no difference between the box simulator and virtual reality groups. For the interns, both groups showed significant overall improvement with no difference between the virtual reality and box simulator groups or on individual skills. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that laparoscopic simulator training improves surgical skills in novice trainees. We found both the box trainers and the virtual reality simulators are equally effective means of teaching laparoscopic skills to novice learners. U Surg 68:282-289. (C) 2011 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 289
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery training for medical students using a virtual reality simulator versus a box trainer: a randomized controlled trial
    Tanoue, K.
    Ieiri, S.
    Konishi, K.
    Yasunaga, T.
    Okazaki, K.
    Yamaguchi, S.
    Yoshida, D.
    Kakeji, Y.
    Hashizume, M.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (04): : 985 - 990
  • [2] Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery training for medical students using a virtual reality simulator versus a box trainer: a randomized controlled trial
    K. Tanoue
    S. Ieiri
    K. Konishi
    T. Yasunaga
    K. Okazaki
    S. Yamaguchi
    D. Yoshida
    Y. Kakeji
    M. Hashizume
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2008, 22 : 985 - 990
  • [3] Endosuture trainer box simulator as a tool for training and teaching in bariatric laparoscopic surgery
    Luiz Gonzaga de Moura Júnior
    Paulo Roberto Leitão de Vasconcelos
    Francisco Vagnaldo Fechine
    Mayra Sabiá de Moura
    Régis Luiz Sabiá de Moura
    Hermano Alexandre Lima Rocha
    Manoel Odorico de Moraes Filho
    [J]. BMC Surgery, 18
  • [4] Endosuture trainer box simulator as a tool for training and teaching in bariatric laparoscopic surgery
    de Moura Junior, Luiz Gonzaga
    Leitao de Vasconcelos, Paulo Roberto
    Fechine, Francisco Vagnaldo
    de Moura, Mayra Sabia
    Sabia de Moura, Regis Luiz
    Lima Rocha, Hermano Alexandre
    de Moraes Filho, Manoel Odorico
    [J]. BMC SURGERY, 2018, 18
  • [5] Feasibility of adapting the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery trainer box to endoscopic skills training tool
    Oscar M. Crespin
    Allan Okrainec
    Andrea V. Kwong
    Ilay Habaz
    Maria Carolina Jimenez
    Peter Szasz
    Ethan Weiss
    Cecilia G. Gonzalez
    Jeffrey D. Mosko
    Louis W. C. Liu
    Lee L. Swanstrom
    Silvana Perretta
    Eran Shlomovitz
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 2968 - 2983
  • [6] Feasibility of adapting the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery trainer box to endoscopic skills training tool
    Crespin, Oscar M.
    Okrainec, Allan
    Kwong, Andrea V.
    Habaz, Ilay
    Jimenez, Maria Carolina
    Szasz, Peter
    Weiss, Ethan
    Gonzalez, Cecilia G.
    Mosko, Jeffrey D.
    Liu, Louis W. C.
    Swanstrom, Lee L.
    Perretta, Silvana
    Shlomovitz, Eran
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (06): : 2968 - 2983
  • [7] Usefulness of a virtual reality simulator or training box for endoscopic surgery training
    T. Kimura
    A. Kawabe
    K. Suzuki
    H. Wada
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2006, 20 : 656 - 659
  • [8] Usefulness of a virtual reality simulator or training box for endoscopic surgery training
    Kimura, T
    Kawabe, A
    Suzuki, K
    Wada, H
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (04): : 656 - 659
  • [9] VALIDATION OF ROBOTIC VR SIMULATOR AND LAPAROSCOPIC BOX TRAINER
    Floyd, Tom
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Reynolds, Chris
    Thomas, Kenneth
    Schenkman, Noah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E516 - E517
  • [10] Laparoscopic virtual reality simulator and box trainer in gynecology
    Akdemir, Ali
    Sendag, Fatih
    Oztekin, Mehmet K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 125 (02) : 181 - 185