Comparing Different Marker Densities and Various Reference Populations Using Pedigree-Marker Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) Model

被引:0
|
作者
Barjasteh, S. [1 ]
Dashab, G. R. [1 ]
Rokouei, M. [1 ]
Shariati, M. M. [2 ]
Valleh, M. Vafaye [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zabol, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, Zabol, Iran
[2] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
来源
关键词
accuracy; genomic selection; marker density; simulation; GENOMIC SELECTION; BREEDING VALUES; DAIRY-CATTLE; INFORMATION; VARIANCE; ACCURACY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In order to have successful application of genomic selection, reference population and marker density should be chosen properly. This study purpose was to investigate the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values in terms of low (5K), intermediate (50K) and high (777K) densities in the simulated populations, when different scenarios were applied about the reference populations selecting. After simulating the historical (undergoing drift and mutation) and recent (undergoing selection) population structures, 800 individuals were remained in reference population. Three scenarios were considered for reducing the reference population number including: 1) 400 individuals which had the highest relationships with the validation set, 2) 400 individuals which had the highest inbreeding, and 3) 400 selected individuals by random. The genomic breeding values were predicted for traits with two heritability levels (0.25 and 0.5) using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) with different markers and pedigree information combinations of included pedigree-based BLUP (ABLUP), which was used a numerator relationships matrix (A) only, genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) which was used a genomic relationship matrix (G) only, and BLUP|GA, which combined both A and G by using a weight parameter (lambda). By increasing lambda, the prediction model was changed from GBLUP (lambda=0) to ABLUP (lambda=1). The results indicated that without considering the panel density effects, G matrix (lambda=0) and A matrix (lambda=1) usages had the highest and lowest prediction accuracy, respectively. Comparative analyses of different scenarios of reference population selection revealed that all individuals' inclusion in reference population yielded the highest estimation accuracy for breeding values (P<0.05). On the contrary, using reduced single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels considerably decreased the accuracy of breeding value prediction. Individuals selecting in the reference set with a high genetic relationship to target animals, considerably improved the reduction in genomic prediction accuracy because of small reference population size.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 239
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] MARKER ASSISTED SELECTION USING BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION
    FERNANDO, RL
    GROSSMAN, M
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 1989, 21 (04) : 467 - 477
  • [2] REDUCED ANIMAL-MODEL FOR MARKER ASSISTED SELECTION USING BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION
    CANTET, RJC
    SMITH, C
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 1991, 23 (03) : 221 - 233
  • [3] Comparison of multiple-trait genetic evaluation accuracy using region marker relationships with traditional best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP)
    Mahboubeh Rostami-Angasi
    Ardeshir Nejati-Javaremi
    Hassan Mehrabani-Yeganeh
    Moradi-Shahrebabak, Mohammad.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 9 (46): : 7781 - 7787
  • [4] GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION (BLUP) WITH DIFFERENT AMOUNTS OF INFORMATION AVAILABLE
    FERGUSON, PW
    HARRIS, DL
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR TIERZUCHTUNG UND ZUCHTUNGSBIOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 1984, 101 (05): : 321 - 329
  • [5] Genetic evaluation by best linear unbiased prediction using marker and trait information in a multibreed population
    Wang, T
    Fernando, RL
    Grossman, M
    GENETICS, 1998, 148 (01) : 507 - 515
  • [6] Prediction of maize double-cross hybrids using the best linear unbiased prediction with microsatellite marker information
    Balestre, M.
    Von Pinho, R. G.
    Souza, J. C.
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2011, 10 (01) : 25 - 35
  • [7] An accurate prediction of maize crosses using diallel analysis and best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP)
    Oliveira, Gustavo H. F.
    Buzinaro, Rodolfo
    Revolti, Lucas T. M.
    Giorgenon, Carlos H. B.
    Charnai, Kaue
    Resende, Diego
    Moro, Gustavo V.
    CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2016, 76 (03): : 294 - 299
  • [8] Marker-assisted best linear unbiased prediction of single-cross performance
    Bernardo, R
    CROP SCIENCE, 1999, 39 (05) : 1277 - 1282
  • [9] Analysis of components of genetic variance and breeding value of kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planch.) using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and pedigree information
    Pinto, C.
    Testolin, R.
    Cipriani, G.
    IX INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON KIWIFRUIT, 2018, 1218 : 73 - 79