ONE PERSPECTIVE ON STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT AT HANFORD

被引:0
|
作者
Martin, Todd
机构
[1] Northport, WA 99157
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 2011年 / 101卷 / 05期
关键词
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; environmental impact; nuclear power industry; public information;
D O I
10.1097/HP.0b013e318229cad2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Hanford nuclear site in Washington State had a major role in the production of nuclear weapons materials during the Manhattan Project in World War II and during the Cold War that followed. The production of weapons-grade radionuclides produced a large amount of radioactive byproducts that have been stored since the mid-1900s at the Hanford Site. These by-product radionuclides have leaked from containment facilities into the groundwater, contaminated buildings used for radionuclide processing, and also contaminated the nuclear reactors used to produce weapons-grade uranium and plutonium. This issue has been a major concern to Hanford stakeholders for several decades, and the U. S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the Washington State Department of Ecology established a Tri-Party Agreement in 1989, at which time Hanford ceased production of nuclear weapons materials and began a major effort to clean up and remediate the Hanford Site's contaminated groundwater, soil, and facilities. This paper describes the concerns of stakeholders in the production of nuclear weapons, the secrecy of Hanford operations, and the potential impacts to public health and the environment from the unintended releases of weapons-grade materials and by-products associated with their production at the Hanford Site. It also describes the involvement of public stakeholders in the development and oversight by the Hanford Advisory Board of the steps that have been taken in cleanup activities at the Hanford Site that began as a major effort about two decades ago. The importance of involvement of the general public and public interest organizations in developing and implementing the Hanford cleanup strategy are described in detail. Health Phys. 101(5): 536-538; 2011
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 538
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Keeping CCS Stakeholder Involvement in Perspective
    Malone, Elizabeth L.
    Bradbury, Judith A.
    Dooley, James J.
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 4789 - 4794
  • [2] A European perspective on stakeholder involvement in nuclear waste management
    Duncan, AG
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON NUCLEAR WAR AND PLANETARY EMERGENCIES - 30TH SESSION, 2004, : 135 - 139
  • [3] Stakeholder involvement in expensive drug recommendation decisions: An international perspective
    Rosenberg-Yunger, Zahava R. S.
    Thorsteinsdottir, Halla
    Daar, Abdallah S.
    Martin, Douglas K.
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2012, 105 (2-3) : 226 - 235
  • [4] User involvement in Swedish residential building projects: a stakeholder perspective
    Johanna Eriksson
    Wiktoria Glad
    Madelaine Johansson
    [J]. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 2015, 30 : 313 - 329
  • [5] User involvement in Swedish residential building projects: a stakeholder perspective
    Eriksson, Johanna
    Glad, Wiktoria
    Johansson, Madelaine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOUSING AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 30 (02) : 313 - 329
  • [6] Tailoring methods of stakeholder involvement - does one size fit all?
    Goyder, E.
    Brereton, L.
    Ingleton, C.
    Gardiner, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 26 : 78 - 78
  • [7] Stakeholder Perspective
    Piper, Kip
    [J]. AMERICAN HEALTH AND DRUG BENEFITS, 2008, 1 (07): : 26 - 26
  • [8] STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVE
    Owens, Gary M.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEALTH AND DRUG BENEFITS, 2011, 4 (07): : 474 - 474
  • [9] One Health in South Asia and its challenges in implementation from stakeholder perspective
    Dahal, Rojan
    Upadhyay, Atul
    Ewald, Benjamin
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2017, 181 (23) : 626
  • [10] Stakeholder theory in perspective
    Pesqueux, Yvon
    Damak-Ayadi, Salma
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2005, 5 (02): : 5 - +