Calving Management: A Questionnaire Survey of Veterinary Subject Matter Experts and Non-Experts

被引:2
|
作者
Voss, Anna Lisa [1 ]
Heuwieser, Wolfgang [1 ]
Mee, John F. [2 ]
Fischer-Tenhagen, Carola [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Fac Vet Med, Clin Anim Reprod, Koenigsweg 65, D-14163 Berlin, Germany
[2] Moorepark Res Ctr, Anim Biosci Res Dept, Fermoy P61 P302, Cork, Ireland
[3] German Fed Inst Risk Assessment, Ctr Protect Expt Anim, D-12277 Berlin, Germany
来源
ANIMALS | 2021年 / 11卷 / 11期
关键词
survey; veterinarians; dairy; calving management; calving prediction; signs of imminent parturition; maternity pen; DAIRY-COWS; GESTATION LENGTH; REPRODUCTIVE-PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL-FACTORS; PERINATAL-MORTALITY; MATERNAL-BEHAVIOR; BIRTH-WEIGHT; CATTLE; CALF; TIME;
D O I
10.3390/ani11113129
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple SummaryWe designed a questionnaire and asked two groups of veterinarians: (1) subject matter experts, who had published on calving management and (2) veterinary practitioners) for their opinion about aspects of calving management. Participants recommended to differentiate between the two stages of parturition and emphasized signs of imminent parturition, such as "restlessness " and "visibility of fetal parts ". There was no consensus on the right time to move the cow to the maternity pen. Almost half of the respondents recommended a 6-h observation interval for prepartum cows in the maternity pen. The two veterinary groups differed little in their knowledge of calving management.Accurate detection of the onset of parturition is a key factor in the prevention of dystocia. In order to establish current best practice recommendations for calving management, we asked subject matter experts (SME) who had published on calving management (by online survey, n = 80) and non-SMEs, veterinary practitioners (by workshop survey, n = 24) for their opinions. For this, we designed a questionnaire on the significance of signs of imminent parturition (SIP), the frequency of calving observation, and influencing factors for the timing of cow movement to a maternity pen. The response rate was 67.5% in the online survey and 100% in the workshop survey. The majority (89.7%) of all respondents agreed that it is beneficial for successful calving management to differentiate between stage I and II of parturition. Of 12 signs of imminent parturition (for stage I and II), "restlessness " and "visibility of fetal parts in vulva " were cited by 56.5% and 73.3% of SME and non-SME respondents, respectively. There was no consensus on the right time to move the cow to the maternity pen; recommendations varied from one to over 21 days. Almost half of the respondents (45.7%) recommended a 6-h observation interval for prepartum cows in the maternity pen. This study identified a strong consensus on the SIP and how and when to observe cows prior to parturition. SMEs and non-SMEs provided broadly similar recommendations, while the SMEs and the non-SMEs differed significantly in the number of publications on calving they authored, they differed little in their knowledge of calving management.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Japanese Bowing of Non-experts by Experts
    Takeda, Tomoya
    Yamashiro, Kazuaki
    Lu, Xiaodan
    Kawakatsu, Shodai
    Ota, Tomoko
    [J]. DIGITAL HUMAN MODELING: APPLICATIONS IN HEALTH, SAFETY, ERGONOMICS, AND RISK MANAGEMENT: ERGONOMICS AND DESIGN, 2017, 10286 : 169 - 178
  • [2] Experts as non-experts: A case from SSC
    Ayabe H.
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 1999, 13 (1-2) : 63 - 68
  • [3] IN PRAISE OF NON-EXPERTS
    HORROBIN, D
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 1982, 94 (1311) : 842 - 844
  • [4] How Much Does Expertise Matter? A Barrier Walkthrough Study with Experts and Non-Experts
    Yesilada, Yeliz
    Brajnik, Giorgio
    Harper, Simon
    [J]. ASSETS'09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGACCESS CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND ACCESSIBILITY, 2009, : 203 - 210
  • [5] Varieties of money - Experts' and non-experts' typicality judgments
    Rumiati, R
    Lotto, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 17 (03) : 403 - 413
  • [6] Automating CFD for non-experts
    Morvan, HP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2005, 7 (01) : 17 - 29
  • [7] YPatent fundamentals for non-experts
    Simmons, ES
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 225 : U556 - U556
  • [8] Differences between Experts and Non-experts in photographic perception and assessment
    Valentina Mulas
    Renato Troffa
    Pierluigi Caddeo
    [J]. Cognitive Processing, 2012, 13 : 275 - 279
  • [10] Epistemological beliefs across faculty experts and student non-experts
    Barnard-Brak, Lucy
    Lan, William
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 33 (03) : 289 - 300