Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin's Lymphoma

被引:8
|
作者
Al-Ibraheem, Akram [1 ,2 ]
Anwer, Farah [1 ,3 ]
Juweid, Malik E. [2 ]
Shagera, Qaid Ahmed [4 ]
Khalaf, Aysar N. [1 ,3 ]
Obeidat, Shahed [1 ]
Mansour, Areen [2 ]
Ma'koseh, Mohammad [5 ]
Halahleh, Khalid [5 ]
Jaradat, Imad [6 ]
Almasri, Nidal [7 ]
Mansour, Asem [8 ]
机构
[1] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Nucl Med & PET CT, POB 1269, Amman 11941, Jordan
[2] Univ Jordan, Sch Med, Amman, Jordan
[3] Warith Int Canc Inst, Dept Nucl Med, Karbala, Iraq
[4] Univ Libre Bruxelles ULB, Inst Jules Bordet, Dept Nucl Med, Brussels, Belgium
[5] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Amman, Jordan
[6] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amman, Jordan
[7] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Amman, Jordan
[8] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Amman, Jordan
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; 2; CYCLES; RESPONSE ASSESSMENT; FREE SURVIVAL; F-18-FDG PET; CHEMOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; TRIAL; SCAN;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-22032-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of interim FDG-PET/CT (iPET) in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) treated with Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy. A total of 245 consecutive patients with de novo HL between 12/2013 and 12/2017 were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were treated with upfront ABVD, performed PET/CT scans at baseline, after 2 cycles (interim PET, iPET2) or 4 cycles (iPET4) and at the end of therapy, and followed up for at least 6 months after therapy. The response status on iPET was defined according to the standard five-point Deauville scores (DS) as follows: complete metabolic response (CMR, DS 1-3) and non-complete metabolic response (nCMR) (DS 4 and 5). End-of-treatment (EoT) response was assessed by FDG-PET/CT and if needed biopsy confirmation of PET-positive findings. The association between iPET and EoT response was investigated using logistic regression analysis. Survival analysis was performed using the Cox regression hazard model and Kaplan-Meier methods. Sixty-nine patients underwent iPET-2 and 176 iPET-4. No association was found between the timing of iPET and iPET response status (P-value = 0.71). Two hundred and one patients (82%) had iPET-CMR and 44 (18%) iPET -nCMR. iPET was strongly associated with EoT response status: 194/201 (96 .5%) of iPET-CMR had a complete response at the EoT while only 21/44 (47.7%) of patients with iPET-nCMR presented a complete response at EoT (P-value < 0.0001). The median follow-up was 32 months (range 6-81). Patients with iPET-CMR presented a better outcome with 91% 3 y event-free-survival (EFS) and 95% 3 y overall survival (OS) than those with iPET-nCMR (41 and 86%, respectively, P-value < 0.0001). In multivariable analyses, iPET retained an independent prognostic factor of EFS and OS (P-value < 0.0001 and P-value = 0.002, respectively). iPET is highly predictive of outcome of HL patients treated with ABVD and allows to tailor therapy to the individual patient.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interim FDG-PET/CT for therapy monitoring and prognostication in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
    Akram Al-Ibraheem
    Farah Anwer
    Malik E. Juweid
    Qaid Ahmed Shagera
    Aysar N. Khalaf
    Shahed Obeidat
    Areen Mansour
    Mohammad Ma’koseh
    Khalid Halahleh
    Imad Jaradat
    Nidal Almasri
    Asem Mansour
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 12
  • [2] Early therapy monitoring with FDG-PET in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s lymphoma
    Tatsuo Torizuka
    Fumitoshi Nakamura
    Toshihiko Kanno
    Masami Futatsubashi
    Etsuji Yoshikawa
    Hiroyuki Okada
    Masahide Kobayashi
    Yasuomi Ouchi
    [J]. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2004, 31 : 22 - 28
  • [3] Early therapy monitoring with FDG-PET in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma
    Torizuka, T
    Nakamura, F
    Kanno, T
    Futatsubashi, M
    Yoshikawa, E
    Okada, H
    Kobayashi, M
    Ouchi, Y
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [4] Interim FDG-PET/CT in Hodgkin lymphoma: what are we actually looking at?
    Adams, Hugo J. A.
    Kwee, Thomas C.
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2018, 57 (08) : 1128 - 1130
  • [5] FDG-PET in Hodgkin's lymphoma
    Ruth Kirby
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2005, 2 (10): : 485 - 486
  • [6] Early interim FDG PET/CT after two cycles of chemotherapy in prognostication of paediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma
    Sharma, Punit
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Bakhshi, Sameer
    Kumar, Rajender
    Singla, Suhas
    Bal, C.
    Malhotra, Arun
    Bandopadhyaya, Guru
    Jeph, Sunil
    Gupta, Arun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 51
  • [7] Role of FDG-PET/CT in Management of Hodgkin's Lymphoma
    Gupta, Arun Kumar
    Kandasamy, Devasenathipathy
    Seth, Rachna
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2009, 76 (12): : 1273 - 1274
  • [8] Role of FDG-PET/CT in management of Hodgkin’s lymphoma
    Arun Kumar Gupta
    Devasenathipathy Kandasamy
    Rachna Seth
    [J]. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2009, 76 : 1273 - 1274
  • [9] Interim FDG-PET/CT for Response Assessment of Lymphoma
    Zeman, Merissa N.
    Akin, Esma A.
    Merryman, Reid W.
    Jacene, Heather A.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 53 (03) : 371 - 388
  • [10] Interim FDG-PET/CT Diagnostics for Monitoring the Response to Therapy with Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma - Analysis of a Series of patients
    Theurich, S.
    Kahraman, D.
    Rothe, A.
    Kuhnert, G.
    Dietlein, M.
    Kobe, C.
    von Bergwelt-Baildon, M.
    [J]. INTERNIST, 2013, 54 : 40 - 40