Estimation of Soil Depth Using Bayesian Maximum Entropy Method

被引:3
|
作者
Liao, Kuo-Wei [1 ]
Guo, Jia-Jun [1 ]
Fan, Jen-Chen [1 ]
Huang, Chien Lin [2 ]
Chang, Shao-Hua [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Bioenvironm Syst Engn, 1,Sect 4,Roosevelt Rd, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
[2] Hetengtech Co Ltd, New Taipei 24250, Taiwan
关键词
slopeland; Bayesian Maximum Entropy; soil depth; physiographic factors;
D O I
10.3390/e21010069
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Soil depth plays an important role in landslide disaster prevention and is a key factor in slopeland development and management. Existing soil depth maps are outdated and incomplete in Taiwan. There is a need to improve the accuracy of the map. The Kriging method, one of the most frequently adopted estimation approaches for soil depth, has room for accuracy improvements. An appropriate soil depth estimation method is proposed, in which soil depth is estimated using Bayesian Maximum Entropy method (BME) considering space distribution of measured soil depth and impact of physiographic factors. BME divides analysis data into groups of deterministic and probabilistic data. The deterministic part are soil depth measurements in a given area and the probabilistic part contains soil depth estimated by a machine learning-based soil depth estimation model based on physiographic factors including slope, aspect, profile curvature, plan curvature, and topographic wetness index. Accuracy of estimates calculated by soil depth grading, very shallow (<20 cm), shallow (20-50 cm), deep (50-90 cm), and very deep (>90 cm), suggests that BME is superior to the Kriging method with estimation accuracy up to 82.94%. The soil depth distribution map of Hsinchu, Taiwan made by BME with a soil depth error of +/- 5.62 cm provides a promising outcome which is useful in future applications, especially for locations without soil depth data.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Depth estimation from gravity data using the maximum entropy method (MEM) and the multi taper method (MTM)
    Bansal, Abhey Ram
    Dimri, Vijay P.
    Sagar, G. Vidya
    [J]. PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2006, 163 (07) : 1417 - 1434
  • [2] Depth Estimation from Gravity Data Using the Maximum Entropy Method (MEM) and the Multi Taper Method (MTM)
    Abhey Ram Bansal
    Vijay P. Dimri
    G. Vidya Sagar
    [J]. pure and applied geophysics, 2006, 163 : 1417 - 1434
  • [3] Bayesian Maximum Entropy prediction of soil categories using a traditional soil map as soft information
    Brus, D. J.
    Bogaert, P.
    Heuvelink, G. B. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2008, 59 (02) : 166 - 177
  • [4] Spatiotemporal fusion of multiple-satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD) products using Bayesian maximum entropy method
    Tang, Qingxin
    Bo, Yanchen
    Zhu, Yuxin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (08) : 4034 - 4048
  • [5] The Bayesian maximum entropy method for lognormal variables
    Orton, T. G.
    Lark, R. M.
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2009, 23 (03) : 319 - 328
  • [6] The Bayesian maximum entropy method for lognormal variables
    T. G. Orton
    R. M. Lark
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2009, 23 : 319 - 328
  • [7] USEFULNESS OF MAXIMUM ENTROPY PRINCIPLE IN BAYESIAN ESTIMATION OF RELIABILITY
    DEELY, JJ
    TIERNEY, MS
    ZIMMER, WJ
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1970, R 19 (03) : 110 - +
  • [8] ENTROPY ESTIMATION USING THE PRINCIPLE OF MAXIMUM ENTROPY
    Behmardi, Behrouz
    Raich, Raviv
    Hero, Alfred O., III
    [J]. 2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2011, : 2008 - 2011
  • [9] Maximum entropy method for angular estimation
    Li Qiang
    Zhang Shou-hong
    Zhang Huan-ying
    Dong Mei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2006 CIE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RADAR, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 1109 - +
  • [10] Space-time mapping of soil salinity using probabilistic bayesian maximum entropy
    A. Douaik
    M. van Meirvenne
    T. Tóth
    M. Serre
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2004, 18 : 219 - 227