The role of surgery in the management of metastatic spinal tumors

The role of surgery in the treatment of metastatic spinal tumors causing epidural compression traditionally consisted of posterior decompression. This procedure plus radiotherapy, however, could not be demonstrated to provide any benefit over radiotherapy alone, and surgery fell into disfavor in managing metastatic vertebral tumors. The advent of newer, more sophisticated approaches, along with improved spinal instrumentation and reconstruction techniques, which allowed direct decompression of neural elements and resection of the tumor, have revived the use of surgery in these tumors. These modern spinal surgery techniques, in combination with radiotherapy, have yielded significantly superior functional outcomes and prolonged survival in symptomatic metastatic epidural compression when compared to radiotherapy alone. Management of spinal metastases is evolving, and a multitude of factors determine the indication for and the technique and goals of surgical intervention. Between 1993 and 2005, 21.1% of patients with metastatic spinal tumors evaluated at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center were treated surgically by the Department of Neurosurgery. The most common spinal metastasis operated upon was metastatic kidney cancer (31.5%), even though kidney cancer was only the third most common primary tumor (after lung and breast cancers) giving rise to vertebral metastases observed during the same time period at this institution. This highlights the importance of the histology of the primary cancer (among other factors) in determining the indication for surgical intervention. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.